<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>SoulHonky</title>
      <link>http://soulhonky.com/</link>
      <description>Honkywood if Honkykood</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:49:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2ysb5-20051201</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title> Random Thoughts</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Is it me or are cell phones making technology worse? Yahoo Mail just got updated and it's the latest in a long line of sites that has made itself simpler and less appealing to the eye in order to function better on cell phones. Telecommunication has taken a step back, switching from phone calls to text messages. Twitter has replaced individual blogs with blurbs. Whodathunkit?</p>

<p>In an unrelated thought, <a target="_blank" href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AvOayOMVunS4ighTz_eZY3s5nYcB?slug=aw-lebronjordan030210&prov=yhoo&type=lgns">Adrian Wojnarowski has a great article on Lebron James's uniform switch.</a> He talks about how the move wasn't to honor Michael but to chase Kobe for the lead in jersey sales (Kobe went to #1 when he switched to #24). I really hope that's true because to move to #6 is a slap in the face to Bill Russell. Sadly, it's a slap that I could see Lebron making since he's much more the businessman like Jordan and is seemingly unwilling to really take a stand politically ala Russell. Sadly, the most influential quote out of an athlete in the last few decades is His Airness's line on why he didn't endorse a candidate, "Republicans buy sneakers, too."<br>
I'm sure Lebron is a good buy but between his corny antics and his icon-chasing ways, I really can't stand him. I know, as a Celtics fan, that I shouldn't say this but I'd much rather see the Lakers win the title than the Cavs. Let Ron Ron, not Lebron, get his first title. Granted, I'm not sure it will even get that far; I don't think the Cavs are going to beat the Orlando Magic.</p>



]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/03/_random_thoughts.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/03/_random_thoughts.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:49:41 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Unhappy Hipsters</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I've promoted the site "Unhappy Hipsters" before but there are a bunch of new updates there that made me laugh, including this one that actually made me laugh out loud.</p>

<a target="_blank" href="http://unhappyhipsters.com/"><img alt="rosebuduh.jpg" src="http://soulhonky.com/rosebuduh.jpg" width="498" height="723" /></a><br>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/03/unhappy_hipsters_1.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/03/unhappy_hipsters_1.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:07:29 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Soy Bomb Speaks</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://theplaylist.blogspot.com/">Found this on The Playlist. </a> This is kind of an interesting show. It is a kind of oddball talk show with the man who is best known as running on stage with Bob Dylan at the Grammys with "Soy Bomb" written on his chest. Anyway, the show is set up as a fake psych session, the "host" being the therapist, asking completely random questions (and a few pointed ones). It's kind of interesting to watch Portnoy and the guests try to make up questions and answers. It's almost like watching a creative writing assignment unfold in front of you. The show is on Hulu but I think it could make for an interesting late night show on some cable channel like Bravo.</p>

<object width="512" height="296"><param name="movie" value="http://www.hulu.com/embed/VPDSEsdW1Lpad4hPUjf9Xw"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.hulu.com/embed/VPDSEsdW1Lpad4hPUjf9Xw" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true"  width="512" height="296"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/03/soy_bomb_speaks.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/03/soy_bomb_speaks.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:07:52 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title> The Tryout: Pantha Du Prince</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>All work and sleeping late makes SoulHonky.com a dull blog. </p>

<p>Might be a slow week on the ol' blog. I'm starting a new episode at work and trying to make it so that March doesn't get wasted like the first two months of this year. Still trying to plot out the pilot I'm working on. I'm trying to write a procedural but I keep delving deeper into involved sub-plots that would make the show more of a serialized show. Ah well. Hopefully I'll write the second act tonight and while I do, I might be listening to this album from Panthu du Prince. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/03/_the_tryout_pantha_du_prince.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/03/_the_tryout_pantha_du_prince.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:31:21 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Respond/React: The Crazies</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="the_crazies_poster.jpg" src="http://soulhonky.com/the_crazies_poster.jpg" width="175" height="260" align="right" />
<p>The Crazies is a mediocre movie which means, in terms of the Zombie genre, it's slightly above average. The film has a couple of great scenes and a decent number of scares but it just kind of rambles about and there isn't really a main focus to give the film any momentum. People just kind of go from one dark place (where they inexplicably split up) to the next (where they decide to leave their pregnant wife by herself). There was probably three film's worth of intriguing concepts in the film but the movie didn't really make anything out of them, usually just getting one "He's behind you!" moment and then moving on. There was also a lot of "sit back, hide, and watch" moments; for a large part of the second act, it was almost like I was watching someone else watch a horror movie.</p>

<p>The acting was solid with Joe Anderson possibly outshining Timothy Olyphant, especially in one pitch perfect moment that I don't want to ruin. Olyphant was solid, as always, but I'd like to see him break out of the Deadwood typecasting he's found himself in and try to flash some personality ala his role in "Go". </p>

<p>The film looked very nice but I often felt like the film focused too much on cinematography and it deadened some of the scares. It's the kind of film that might have been scarier with a lower budget feel to it. </p>

<p>As I walked out after the movie, a lot of people seemed to like the film but I wouldn't really recommend it. The Rotten Tomatoes/Metacritic scores are probably right - fans of the genre will think it's a 71% film while non-fans will probably see it as 56% (or maybe even a bit lower).  Personally, I'd say it's a film best "discovered" on the movie channels on TV. The lower expectations, the better. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/respondreact_the_crazies.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/respondreact_the_crazies.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 11:32:19 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title> Linkage</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Playlist gave a great link to a site that shows what happens when <a target="_blank" href="http://www.showgirls2.com/">NSFW meets WTF?! It's the trailer for the new Showgirls 2</a>, a film that supposedly cost 25 million to make. It looks like it cost 25 bucks and they couldn't even afford towels to dry up the water from previous takes (You'll get that if you watch even the first few seconds of the trailer.) Apparently the site has gotten too much traffic but this is a film that has the potential to match "The Room" as one of the great disasters of modern cinema. Or, it could just be incredibly boring, which the trailer is despite all the boobage.</p>

<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2010/02/know-your-tv-drama-pilots-2010-cop-doc-or-lawyer.html">The Hollywood Reporter's blog has a nice roundup of the new dramas coming this fall</a>, although I haven't found part 1 of the article yet. Anyway, there are, as should be expected, a lot of "Mentalist" rip-offs, some more acronyms for CBS, and a lot of cop shows. Thankfully, none of the shows are like the idea I'm currently working on although there are a few that come dangerously close. I've revamped the idea so it's moved away from Michael Chiklis's family of superheroes show. One of my heroes also has supermemory, which is what one show this season is about, but I'm betting my girl is different. Also, I just don't see how a great memory is really a great concept for a full hour drama.</p>

<p>With all of the new cop shows, I've been considering working on "The Lost Angels" again. It's a spoof of TV detective shows and films but I haven't figured out if I want to make it a straight spoof or just a satire. Granted, the terrible reviews of "Cop Out" probably won't help me sell the satire angle, especially since the script it was based on was once considered one of the best unproduced screenplays in Hollywood. You should check out the bad reviews at Rotten Tomatoes; seems like a lot of critics have been waiting for a chance to rip Kevin Smith a new one. My guess is that the movie, like most of his work, is stupid but with enough sporadic laughs that the fanboys will still love him while others are left underwhelmed.</p>

<p>Other than that, I've just been sitting back and thinking about whether a prequel to Entourage would work. Maybe it's just for a few episodes but I think the show would be a lot better off if they spent some time in this next season, going back to when Vince first came out to Hollywood or when Drama was living the high life as the star of Viking Quest. I think it would be a better direction than their current one, with E getting married and everyone basically doing nothing. Turtle could struggle living off of Vince's much shorter coattails, Vince could have to deal with the crap that all wanna be actors deal with, Ari could be Ari. It worked for the West Wing and I think more shows might be wise to take a page from reboot craze in the film world to try it with their programs. I was thinking about maybe trying to write a spec but I'd need to do some research. I'm sure Ari's mentioned where he first noticed Vince but I don't remember and couldn't find it on the web.</p>

<p>That's all I got for now. Not great but hey, at least it's better than this.</p>
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_6iWwHcgasI&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_6iWwHcgasI&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_linkage.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_linkage.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:01:02 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title> S.I.N.S. - B.A.E. Scriptosode 3</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Well here is what I think could be the final scriptosode of Best Apocalypse Ever. It's not that the story is finished, it's just that these are the only three ideas that I had for this and I'm not sure how much time I'm going to spend on thinking of another adventure for these three to get into. WIth a little reworking, this could be a decent first act for a script but I have no idea where I'd go.</p>

<p>Are there actually zombies? Do they just wander the Earth running into other people? Does everyone just wake up?</p>

<p>There are a lot of possibilities; none of which I'm all that interested in right now. Maybe if I come up with something, I'll do it but right now this could be the end of Helen, Ashley, and Alex. </p>

<p>If you missed the first two installments, <a href="http://soulhonky.com/BAE/ "> you can check out all three right here.</a></p>

<img alt="BAE ep3 1.jpg" src="http://soulhonky.com/BAE/BAE%20ep3%201.jpg" width="544" height="688" />

]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_sins_bae_scriptosode_3.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_sins_bae_scriptosode_3.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:23:36 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title> MTV dumps Gen X</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.thrfeed.com/2010/02/mtv-pushing-out-cynical-generation-x-.html">From The Hollywood Reporter's THR Feed site.</a><br></p>

<blockquote>TV Networks president Van Toffler reiterated the network's devotion to millennials (a.k.a Generation Y), but also made it clear that Generation X shouldn't let the door hit them on the way out.<br>
"We're pushing Generation X out," Toffler said. "We're slaves to our different audiences, for MTV that's millennials, who are vastly different than Generation X; they're definitely less cynical -- they're more civic minded."<br>
As evidence of the fine taste of this benevolent new generational breed, Toffler cited ... "Jersey Shore."<br>
The network president said, "Millennials are really about authentic reality and family" and that MTV "played up the camaraderie and family elements [on 'Jersey Shore']" to appeal to them.</blockquote>

<p>This is actually a perfectly played hand because I'd say it's sad that this guy buys his own brand of bullshit but then that would just paint me as cynical and prove him right. Also, I have a feeling that this might be a nicer way for him to kick the once promising, now lackluster Gen X out of the basement and into the real world. He could have been more honest and said, "Gen X is a bunch of 30-somethings who don't buy the products are advertisers are selling. Don't blame me that they haven't gotten off the MTV teet and found actual grown-up programming to watch. It's not our fault that they were raised by Sega and are now pacified by Wii. Well, not entirely. Whatever; we should have been done with them about 5 years ago." </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_mtv_dumps_gen_x.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_mtv_dumps_gen_x.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:06:31 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title> The Tryout: Local Natives </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Well, I planned on putting together a legit post for this week's Tryout but then I saw the list of new releases this week and knew I would never get through them. This week sees new music from: Alkaline Trio, All Time High, Brian Jonestown Massacre, David Byrne and Fatboy Slim, K-OS, Lifehouse, Kidz In The Hall, Joanna Newsom, The Streets, Marina & The Diamonds, The Brunettes, Toro Y Moi, and Xiu Xiu. There was also albums I missed like Local Natives, Scanners, Mumford & Sons, and Yeasayer. </p>

<p>In the end, I decided to go with the new Pitchfork darlings Local Natives. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_the_tryout_local_natives.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_the_tryout_local_natives.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:22:46 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title> Increasingly Poor Decisions</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>When I first watched the short bit of David Cross's new BBC series "The Increasingly Poor Decisions of Todd Margaret, I wasn't a huge fan. I can't remember exactly what I didn't like but it seemed like a bunch of guys who loved the fact that they could swear on TV. Any way, I have too much faith in David Cross to just write it off after that one segment so now that the full pilot is out, I'm going to give it a second chance. </p>

<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SvPZ1psOMrM&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SvPZ1psOMrM&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
<br>
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9-Z1g_fqfzY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/9-Z1g_fqfzY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
<br>
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/EMtFRQhzAwI&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/EMtFRQhzAwI&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_increasingly_poor_decisions.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_increasingly_poor_decisions.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:23:36 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Politicked Off: The State of the Republican Party</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>CPAC finally came to an end with Glenn Beck basically saying that the Republicans are as guilty as anyone for what's going on right now and the crowd booing its own strawpoll Presidential winner, Ron Paul. </p>

<object width="416" height="374" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="ep"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=politics/2010/02/20/sot.cpac.paul.straw.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=politics/2010/02/20/sot.cpac.paul.straw.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="374"></embed></object>

<p>This is basically why the Republicans have become the party of no; because they have nobody, no ideas, and no real clue how to make things better for the middle American. Most people don't like the bailout but they also aren't in the mood to keep thinking that tax cuts for the rich are going to help their state either. It's easier for the Republicans to just fight against the President than actually come up with ideas of their own so that's what they are doing, hoping that they can ride the current anger in the nation to a victory in the next elections. Sadly, it will probably work because while the Democrats have plans, they don't seem to have the determination to get them done.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/politicked_off_the_state_of_th.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/politicked_off_the_state_of_th.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:13:43 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Respond/React: Shutter Island</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>"Shutter Island" is a well made film that I thought should have been at least a half an hour shorter. Of course, it's also the kind of film that I wouldn't recommend people listen to my opinion because I often enjoy these films less (especially after the first viewing) than most other people. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/respondreact_shutter_island.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/respondreact_shutter_island.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:50:24 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title> S.I.N.S. - B.A.E. Scriptosode 2</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed the first episode of Short I'll Never Shoot, <a target="_blank" href="http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_sins_bae.html ">you can read what would be the first ep of B.A.E. right here.</a> As for those of you who have had checked it out, I have another scriptosode for you. Actually, I wrote out two and have an idea for the third but I thought I'd hold onto the other one because 14 pages is a lot of silliness to read in one sitting and it gives me something else to post when I have nothing to say (which, sadly for my friends, isn't often). </p>

<p>Anyway, here is B.A.E., episode 2. (Pardon any typos, half-assed writing, or time issues.)</p>
<div align="center">

<img alt="BAE ep2 1.jpg" src="http://soulhonky.com/BAE%20ep2%201.jpg" width="564" height="662" /><br></div>
]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_sins_bae_scriptosode_2.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_sins_bae_scriptosode_2.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:54:39 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title> The Tryout: Russian Circles</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I have to be honest, even though February is the new January, I think I've been lazier/worse with my resolutions than last month. I was hoping to turn things around this week but I've been going to bed earlier and sleeping later which doesn't exactly make things more efficient. </p>

<p>Anyway, I didn't look for anything for this week's Tryout so I'll throw in a group I stumbled upon last week, The Russian Circles, who deliver some rocking instrumentals and are another group that I wouldn't be surprised to find scoring an indie film in the future. </p>

<p>With this month half over, I really need to get my shit together. I have two acts roughed out on a new TV script, a few ideas for the web series B.A.E., and some other random ideas floating around that I really should be working on. I've also been thinking about revamping the ol' SoulHonky site. Not loving it right now (well, I'm loving the picture of Michelle Trachtenberg but not much else.)</p>

<div align="center">
<object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.lala.com/external/flash/PlaylistWidget.swf" id="lalaAlbumEmbed" width="300" height="254"><param name="movie" value="http://www.lala.com/external/flash/PlaylistWidget.swf"/><param name="wmode" value="transparent"/><param name="allowNetworking" value="all"/><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"/><param name="flashvars" value="albumId=5620773812149551930&host=www.lala.com&partnerId=memberalbum.60355%4034494"/><embed id="lalaAlbumEmbed" name="lalaAlbumEmbed" src="http://www.lala.com/external/flash/PlaylistWidget.swf" width="300" height="254" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" wmode="transparent" allowNetworking="all" allowScriptAccess="always" flashvars="albumId=5620773812149551930&host=www.lala.com&partnerId=memberalbum.60355%4034494"></embed></object><div style="font-size: 9px; margin-top: 2px;"><a href="http://www.lala.com/album/5620773812149551930" title="Geneva - Russian Circles" target="_blank">Geneva - Russian Circles</a></div></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_the_tryout_russian_circles.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/_the_tryout_russian_circles.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:22:16 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Respond/React: Good and Bad</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="a-michelle-trachtenberg-pic.jpg" src="http://soulhonky.com/a-michelle-trachtenberg-pic.jpg" width="214" height="359" align="left" BORDER=2 hspace="5" /> 
<p>A bad weekend for the ol' resolutions. Had too much to drink and spent too much money on Saturday which led to me laying around in pain on Sunday and watching some bad movies. The new bad movie I watched was "17 Again" with Zac Efron which was pretty lame. There was some nice looking high school girls in it, including Michelle Trachtenberg who was crush-worthy in the flick, but all-in-all, the movie was just pretty lame. Granted, that's to be expected since it's a remake of a lame 80's movie but you'd like to think that people would try to elevate the films they redo rather than just make a different version of the same disposable entertainment. </p>

<p>On the bright side, I did remember my resolution to watch better films so I did end up watching "In the Loop", a British political comedy. It wasn't what I expected. From the rave reviews, I expected more of a high-minded comedy but a lot of the humor came from people swearing at one another and calling each other names. Still, the film was pretty funny and the end was even a bit poignant. I'd recommend the film but go in with lower expectations; the rave reviews it got made me expect too much but it's a good movie.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/respondreact_good_and_bad.html</link>
         <guid>http://soulhonky.com/2010/02/respondreact_good_and_bad.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:33:47 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
