Main

September 02, 2009

Most Randomly Popular Line Ever

If you are in LA or are ever going to visit the area, one of the shows you have to check out is Point Break Live, a low rent theatrical rendition of Point Break (with the role of Keanu being played by an audience member who reads off of cue cards). I went to see it last Saturday and my friend Jay and I were both stunned at the fact that there is one line that is immensely popular for seemingly no reason whatsoever. I mean, "I am an F B I agent!" at least has Keanu's je ne sais quoi but this one line is a quotable for no apparent reason.


Hosting by Yahoo!

August 31, 2009

The SoulHonky Rules: Stupid is as Stupid Does

Rule #2: Stupid Is As Stupid Does

Nothing takes me out of a movie than when a hero or key character does something incredibly stupid. When a plot is set in motion by a character doing something completely illogical, I just can't follow along. I don't care and most times I feel no sympathy for the heroes. The last episode of "True Blood" featured a couple of these moments and the series "Heroes" basically got all of their tension out of people acting illogically.

What makes matters worse is when the same person who pulled the stupid move to get the protagonists into trouble is also the same person who figures out how to get them out. Maybe it reminds me too much of the workplace in which people are often inexplicably given credit for saving the workplace from a disaster they themselves created but it is something that I find incredibly annoying. I had to stop watching "Heroes" because of it. The supposed Heroes caused at least 75% of their own problems. Watching them clean up their own messes just didn't interest me and when one season was promoted as the heroes fighting off a government plan to round them up, I was rooting for the government. How can you root for people who keep putting the world at risk?

One of the more recent examples of this was in "Fringe". The lead character is kidnapped and almost experimented on, her lover had earlier turned out to be a double-agent, every week she's finding more crazy things happening around her, someone is obviously out to get her, and then her sister and niece come and ask to stay with her and she says it's fine. No problem. She literally had just escaped her captors and then moments later apparently sees no problem whatsoever with her loved ones crashing at her pad. Needless to say, we're supposed to be stunned when the niece immediately find herself in harm's way.

The bottom line is that if the inciting action of a movie is a mistake of some sort, it has to be an honest mistake that most of the audience would have made. If someone does something stupid or completely illogical, it throws off the rest of the film. The foundation of the script is weak and there might not be anything that happens afterwards that can save it. If your character do stupid things, odds are that your movie is going to seem stupid.


Hosting by Yahoo!

August 24, 2009

The SoulHonky Rules: Heroes Don't Die

Since I post reviews of movies, I think it's important that I also mention my pet peeves or things that are required for me to like a movie. In some cases, of course, personal taste/interests make me like a film more than I probably should. Case in point, I loved Watchmen but a lot of that had to do with the fact that it hit on things that I am interested in. I could absolutely see why others would find the film to be a complete bore. Anyway, I thought I'd start compiling a list of the things that I basically need to enjoy a movie.

Rule #1: Heroes Don't Die

As a savvy/jaded filmgoer, I go into a movie pretty much knowing one thing: the main character is not going to die and if by some crazy twist, he/she does die, it's not going to be until the final scene or so. For that reason, I really don't get that fired up or nervous about a scene in which the only threat is to the main character's life. If I'm sitting in a theater and we're 40 minutes into a film, I know that the lead character isn't going to die and any threat to his/her life isn't that daunting. If the conclusion is obvious, there isn't any tension.
Now, there are three ways around this issue.

1."How" Not "If": There's one movie this summer that is supposedly a white knuckle thriller but all of the action scenes only focused on IF the main character would make it. Since you know he isn't going to die midway through the film, I was just never on the edge of my seat. The fact of the matter is that for a scene to really work for me personally, the focus needs to be on HOW the person is going to survive not IF he is going to live.
James Bond is the king of this. Everyone knows that Bond isn't going to die, but he always has some suave move or cool gadget to help him get out of his scrapes. Whenever Jason Bourne was in trouble, you didn't think "Is this the end of Jason Bourne?", you sat up and wondered, "How's he going to fight his way out of this one?!" Die Hard is another example of this. While survival was obviously the main goal, getting the attention of the police and finding a way to end the hostage situation were equally important goals. Even if you realized that Bruce Willis wasn't going to catch a bullet midway through the movie, it's interesting to watch the bad guys (and sometimes the good guys) thwart his plans to save the day.

2. The Predator Ensemble:: Just because the lead character isn't going to die doesn't mean that everyone has to live. You often can get around a lead character's inevitable escapes by adding side characters who may or may not make it. I can still follow the main character's heroics but then worry about the supporting cast's safety. This is why horror films are scary; there are usually a bevy of supporting actors, all of whom could eat it at any second. Scenes in which the lead is getting threatened are usually the least frightening of the film. You're just watching a chase that you know is going to end with the good guy/girl getting away.
Other great examples of this are Predator, Alien, Aliens, and Band of Brothers. I hate to include Band of Brothers because it's a true story and real lives were lost but it's basically the best example of how films should be written.
That being said, you have to establish these supporting characters early on and get the audience to care about them. You can't have the characters who die be nobodies ala Star Trek's infamous Red Shirts. Also, you can't do the Lost: Season 2 trick of just adding new characters and then killing them off. It barely worked in a TV series and it definitely doesn't work in films. Unfortunately, this is happening more and more often in films and it's getting to the point that whenever you see a new character pop up (especially if it's a known actor), you can be pretty sure that they are going to get popped in the near future.
Then, of course, there's the cardinal sin that "Heroes" has committed: Death is Not Forever. So many people have died and come back in that show that nobody cares if somebody dies because they realize that they are probably just going to come back.

3. Kill The Hero: This rarely happens and I'm not sure if I can remember the last time I've seen it but killing the leading man is always an option, especially in an ensemble film. Now I don't mean the now cliche "Scream" trick of putting a famous face in the beginning of the film and killing her to make people think anyone is at risk. By now, people get that gimmick already. But it really seems like it is about time for a leading man to get it in a movie and then have the supporting members have to step up and save the day.

Long story short, if the main driving element of a film is "Will the good guys win?!" or "Will the hero survive?!", I'm going to be bored to tears. Everyone knows the day is going to be saved, HOW the day is saved is what is entertaining.


Hosting by Yahoo!

March 04, 2009

Cinesomnia: Dig!

Cinematical.com clued me into a new site with free movies. You can head over to www.snagfilms.com to check out some new movies. One movie that they have is Dig!, a documentary about the rise of the Dandy Warhols and the fall of the Brian Jonestown Massacre. I'm not sure if the embed/widget really works so if it doesn't you can click here to watch the movie.

One thing that is very interesting about the film is that you really have to read between the lines. Obviously the film is biased; it's narrated by the leader of the Dandy Warhols. But it is also odd in that it buys into the notion that Anton, the leader of the Massacre, is this absolute genius. They continue to buy their own BS and feed this guy's ego even though they saw what became of him and how the supposed success never really materialized. In the end, it's a meditation on two bands who were never as appreciated as they thought they should have been but the film never really goes into whether or not they really should have ever been all that appreciated. It's an interesting doc especially because the doc itself says as much about Courtney Taylor, leader of the Dandy's, as the footage does of Anton.


Hosting by Yahoo!

February 05, 2009

If Friedberg and Seltzer wrote "Wedding Movie"

Inspired by a message board post by Buddy Gilapagos, what if the makers of "Meet the Spartans" and "Date Movie" and that other crap wrote a 2008 recap called "Wedding Movie". Can you predict what it might look like?

- Open with two lovers, played by Jayma Mays (or someone else who looks like Anna Faris) and Kal Penn, having their trip canceled, looks like Four Christmases for them. What? It's only one Christmas?! Their mom and Dad is Madea! Cue Mamma Mia paternity-inspired musical number.

- The girl runs away from boy and get in her car, The Speed Racer. The guy gets in car. Death race ensues. The cars blow up and the boy chases the girl through trainyard. Boy keeps getting run over by trains. Finally he gets to her but a Bollywood dance number breaks out. Boy gets his by train again. Dies. Or does he?

Continue reading " If Friedberg and Seltzer wrote "Wedding Movie"" »


Hosting by Yahoo!

January 24, 2009

Cinesomnia: The Missouri Breaks

I can't sleep so I thought I might as well post, and watch, a forgotten moment in film history. I can't say this is a great movie or even a very good one but it is the only on-screen pairing of two classic American actors and good friends, Jack Nicholson and Marlon Brando.

The film is "The Missouri Breaks" and stands out for one scene (when Nicholson barges in on Brando in a bubble bath" that Jack said was a humbling experience because no matter what he did, he was upstaged by Marlon. It also is notable for the fact that Brando was really going off of the deep end and demanded that he play the hired gun as a kind of schizo-dresser (he's always the same guy but wears all sorts of different clothes from a dress to a [riest's habit). One last factoid: the bug in the mouth scene was improvised. The director loved it and had Marlon do it for the following takes, something which didn't sit well with Randy Quaid, who wasn't particularly happy about getting a bug stuck in his mouth time and time again.

So there you have it. Sit back and enjoy "The Missouri Breaks".

Hosting by Yahoo!

January 19, 2009

The Fanboy Era

In terms of American big studio films, The Aughts has been a lackluster decade. One reason I think that is so is because this has been The Era of the Fanboys. Now, don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with fanboys. Also, fanboys in this case doesn't just mean sci-fi fans or horror groupies. People can blame the blogosphere for "Snakes on a Plane" but internet scuttlebutt also got "The Women" a wider (and equally undeserved) release. And the biggest fanboys are arguably the Sundance/indie crowd; how many films have they "loved" that then came out and not only tanked but just weren't that good? While fanboys often bemoan the fact that their genres are watered down too much for public consumption, indie fans revel in the fact that most people don't want to sit through their films.

The problem as I see it is that the studios' focus of fanboy affection is on the ancillary elements of a beloved genre and those elements are held in higher regard than the need for strong stories and compelling characters. Horror films became torture porn or completely campy. Actions films have become a collection of over-the-top set pieces and explosions. Comedy became raunch. In a fairly interesting twist, women were pushed out as chick flicks were no longer female dreams of finding true love; they were male coming-of-age fantasies. Thrillers are all but dead since those seem to require actual craftsmanship. Art House films are almost comically focused on the self-absorbed pain and anguish hidden in ordinary households. Today, the artsier films don't pretend to even consider having a mainstream appeal while mainstream films mostly gave up the idea that they could insterest the masses without being the lowest common denominator. In terms of quality, I think this decade has been carried by foreign films and documentaries.

I also don't think it's a coincidence that the one genre that has really made strides this decade is superhero movies. While every other genre has seemed to decline towards its base level, superhero films have expanded and become more than just capes and crime fighters. The characters are becoming fleshed out, the struggles are both saving the world and internal; things aren't just good and evil anymore.

While I hope that The Dark Knight could inspire more thoughtful storylines (although it would be nice to do so without so many monologues), odds are that Hollywood's response will be "Ooh, people want darker movies".


Hosting by Yahoo!

January 14, 2009

The Sequel Shuffle

There's a natural order to sequels. Not all films follow this route but this is how I'd say most film series end up playing out.

Film #1: The film is a smash success and leave people wanting more. And "people" could mean the audience or a cult following or a studio head who is in desperate need of a hit and thinks that remaking a film is a sure thing.

Film #2: A carbon copy of the first. The latest example is probably "National Treasure: Book of Secrets" which was basically the exact same movie as National Treasure. Sometimes, in cases like X2 or The Godfather, the sequel could actually build upon the first movie but more often than not, the movie is a watered down version of the first film.

Film #3: This film is usually terrible. Whether it's because the story line was spead too thin or too many people are now involved with the production or because the stars refused to do it or because everyone was just in it for the paycheck, third films almost always struggle. Usually, this is where most film series end.

Note: In some cases, films 2 and 3 are reversed, the second one sucks so they make a third one, which to ensure quality, is basically a rehash of the first movie (see: Ocean's 11)

But some are lucky to get to a fourth movie. And when you get to a fourth movie, all hell breaks loose. Fourth movies are usually the height of silliness. Often it can work (Live Free or Die Hard, Rocky IV) but other times it fails miserably (Superman IV, Alien: Resurrection). For Fast and Furious, I have a feeling that its going to work out and give us a movie that would be the thrill ride of the summer if you weren't laughing so hard at it.


Hosting by Yahoo!

January 05, 2009

Honkywood: The Shazam Story

I have to say, I wasn't really all that interested in the proposed film version of Shazam. I don't think I actually  saw the cartoon or ever read the comic. That being said, John August's account of what happened with the film and how it went from a comedic movie starring a kid to (proposed) edgier, older fare and then fell from greenlight heaven to development hell is interesting. The key components, it seems, had nothing to do with the script itself but rather centered around the box office.

In retrospect, I can point to two summer Warner Bros. movies that I believe defined the real issue at hand: Speed Racer and The Dark Knight. The first flopped; the second triumphed. Given only those two examples, one can understand why a studio might wish for their movies to be more like the latter. But to do so ignores the success of Iron Man, which spent most of its running time as a comedic origin story, and the even more pertinent example of WB’s own Harry Potter series. I tried to make this case, to no avail.

You can find the full story at John August's blog but it's very interesting to see how a veteran screenwriter like August (who penned Go! and Big Fish, among others) can be felled by the foibles of the front office. It shows how people can be confident in an idea until an even barely comparable film struggles. This is the industry I'm trying to work in.


Hosting by Yahoo!

In Defense of Heigl

As a confessed fan of romantic-comedies, I have to say that there are few actresses that I am interested in seeing in a rom-com as much as Katherine Heigl. I think she has great comic timing and, of course, is easy on the eyes. I'm also a fan of Rock'n'rolla style Gerard Butler, he could fill the slot vacated by Mel Gibson, so the trailer for "The Ugly Truth" is one of my favorite previews out there right now.

Unfortunately, it seems like Katherine Heigl has hurt her reputation with many (or, at least, many on the internet) because she speaks her mind. Is that really a bad thing? While I know a lot of people bow to the throne of Apatow, let's be honest, most of his films are male coming-of-age fantasies and not really rom-coms. When Heigl said she was somewhat displeased with the portrayal of women in "Knocked Up" (saying the film "paints the women as shrews, as humorless and uptight, and it paints the men as goofy, fun-loving guys... It was hard for me to love the movie.") was she really wrong? Seth Rogen is a hero in the movie for doing the bare minimum. The guy gets a job and reads a baby book and suddenly he's the hero. The movie was fun and all but let's not go crazy and start acting like what she said wasn't true.

Heigl also wasn't fond of where her Grey's character was going, which was something that a number of fans were saying (and even more fans jumped off of the bandwagon this year and I haven't heard her going public over how she feels about her ghostly love affair). Also, not to go all Tina Fey on the issue, but when men sound off about their roles, most people overlook it. Wentworth Miller recently questioned his character in "Prison Break" and I believe it was William Peterson who once said his role on C.S.I. wasn't acting, it was just reciting.

People also need to get over it because Heigl has the kind of look that makes for a star. She's pretty but not the belle of the ball. You can believe that James Marsden would hit on her but you could also believe that Ed Burns could overlook her and fall for her younger sister instead. "Marley and Me" winning the box office for two straight weeks means that Jennifer Aniston won't lose her crown of top box office star that most guys don't think should really be a box office star but Katherine Heigl is running a close second. Or third if you count Sarah Jessica Parker. That might seem like a diss to Katherine Heigl but it's actually a compliment and one that I don't think she would be ashamed to take. 

As for the movie, it's written by Karen McCullah Lutz, who also wrote "10 Things I Hate About You" and "Legally Blonde". Granted, she seems to be repeating herself of late, revisiting Blonde with "The House Bunny" and the make-a-bet-that-you-can't-get-someone-to-fall-in-love storyline is a wee bit similar to "The Taming of the Shrew" (although it has an interesting twist in this case). Also it features Cheryl Hines and NewRadio's Vicki Lewis as well as soon-to-be That Girl Bree Turner (a girl who's pretty enough to notice but not stunning enough to remember). What's not to... really like? Well, besides it being a romantic-comedy which most people don't (or won't own up to) liking.

Some might wonder how "The Ugly Truth" is any different but this seems to be a film that addresses the very problems Heigl brought up with "Knocked Up". There's a line (and in films, it's often a fine line) between being shrewish and being "normal" or professional. The film seems to focus more on guys, asking Do guys just want a woman who will be the object of their affection or do they really appreciate the finer things?  It's an interesting take on the makeover movie. In many movies, especially the Apatow comedies, the question is whether the guy can become a functioning human being in time to melt his damsel in distress's heart. I don't begrudge Katherine Heigl her fame nor her opinion. In fact, I hope to see and hear more from her in the future.


Hosting by Yahoo!

November 18, 2008

Good Riddance to Oscar Season

I know I complain about this every year but Oscar season is the dumbest concept ever created by Hollywood. We've sat through 11 months of mostly mediocre to bad films and now in the last three weeks of the year, we're going to be hit with a deluge of dramas. It just makes no sense.

This summer, there was a minor controversy when The Love Guru and Get Smart opened on the same weekend. Usually studios plan their summer schedules out so there isn't that kind of head-to-head battle. It's better for business. Also, when the summer schedule started getting more and more packed, the studios decided to open the summer season earlier and earlier. Even though the initial thinking of releasing blockbusters in the summer is that kids are off from school and more likely to go to a movie, the season now starts in May when kids are still stuck in class. Not that that matters, films like Iron Man still make tons of money.

With Oscar season, the thinking is completely different. The Oscar slates have been becoming more and more packed but instead of spacing the films out, the scedule has been condensed. You used to see Oscar season start in November. This year, most of the top Oscar prospects don't come out until the second week of December. While people were amazed that Steve Carrell and Mike Myers went head-to-head this summer, nobody seems to bat an eye at the fact that the final weekend of 2008 features Tom Cruise vs. Brad Pitt vs. Leonardo DiCaprio (with an Adam Sandler kids movie and that Marley and Me flick thrown in just for fun).

The funniest part is that in terms of box office success, most of these films are still blown away by mainstream fodder like Night at the Museum or National Treasure 2 so it's not like these movies are somehow more successful at the end of the year. (And don't give me that crap about the Oscar bump. More films are lost in the shuffle than get a boost after the Oscar nods or Golden Globes). 

Thankfully, next year seems better. They are opening a few Oscar-type films in October and even have some opening in the spring (most notably State of Play, which boasts an impressive cast and is based on a great British mini-series). Hopefully this will be the last year we have to deal with the cinema tsunami at the end of the year and can instead be treated to quality films throughout the calendar.


Hosting by Yahoo!

September 19, 2008

Where's the Romance?

After reading the glowing reviews for the bland, wait-for-cable "Ghost Town", I've come to realize that the rom-com has been replaced by the com-o-age film. The bottom line is that today's romantic comedies simply do not have any romance in them. Instead, these movies focus on one character's realization that they are immature and need to grow up. The women in these films (be it Wedding Crashers, Knocked Up, or Ghost Town) are little more than tangible rewards waiting for the guys at the end of their journeys.

Yesterday's Battle of the Sexes has been replaced with today's Refusal to Grow Up. I guess it shouldn't be a surprise that a generation that extols the virtues of "30 is the new 20" finds itself embracing films about retarded inner-growth but can't we at least have two people battling these issues? Can't we fill our comedies with relationships that have more hurdles than just the man's own immaturity? And I'm not glamorizing the past. It's not like Doris Day and Rock Hudson played three-dimensional characters in most of their films but at least both of their characters had personality, problems, and potential.

What might be the most troubling aspect of this latest movement is that there are a bevy of beauties out there who are being wasted. These talented actresses are given nothing to work with despite the fact that I'd argue that most of them have more to offer than the male counterparts. Gone is the whip-smart dialogue. For these ladies, hi-jinks rarely ensue. Instead, their job is to sit and giggle all googly-eyed while the leading man gets to play both the cad and the hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold.

Now don't get me wrong, some of these films are entertaining. I'm not saying that these films should be done away with. I just wish that a) we would call them what they are and b) actually get some legit rom-com's in the cineplexes.

Much like the modern spoof movies that don't actually spoof anything, there's little romance in the modern rom-com. And, to me, that's a damn shame.


Hosting by Yahoo!

September 05, 2008

The 20 or So Most Influential Films of Cinema's Second Century

Nobody can really be sure who invented the first film projector. There are many claims and different fathers of cinema but I'm going to side with the Frenchman Louis Lumiere. Not only did Lumiere have one of the first widely recognized projectors but he also showed the incredible foresight that defines most Hollywood executives when he famously spoke, "The cinema is an invention without a future."

Lumiere's claimed date of invention was 1895 so let's say that the second century of cinema actually started 13 years ago. So which films since 1995 have proven to be the most influential? To start, there's a difference between influential and inspirational. Many people have been inspired by Little Miss Sunshine, Best in Show, or L.A. Confidential, but those films didn't really have a lasting impact on the fact on the face of the Hollywood. A lot of people cite "Lost Highway" as a classic but nobody has been able to (and few have even tried) to follow in Lynch's footsteps.
Similarly, a film has to have a lasting impact. Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings started an onrush of kiddie lit movies but almost all of them have been disappointing. My Big Fat Greek Wedding got studios thinking that there was money in independent film but now everyone's closing their indie arms (mainly because the faux-indies still held to the Major Studio way of thinking and would have had nothing to do with a film like Greek Wedding). Some might sing the praises of Sex and the City saving female-centric films, but we heard the same song and dance after The First Wives Club. In the end, you can't tell the true influence right away so for this list, I'm only looking at the first decade of this second century, 1995 - 2005.

1. Toy Story (1995)
The reign of Pixar and computer animation begins!
2. Independence Day/Twister (1996)
Bombast over believability, these films ushered in the new era of blockbusters in which special effects trumped substance and script. If it wasn't for these films, movies like Transformers might have to actually spend time on plots, characters, and a love story with more emotion than "I'm really glad I got in that car with you."
3. X-Men (2000)
Comic book movies weren't seen as legit box office threats in 2000. The marquee heroes (Batman and Superman) had fallen off, other attempts were either modest successes (Spawn, Blade, The Crow) or disasters (Barb Wire, Tank Girl). In Hollywood, X-Men wasn't seens as a property that had wide appeal or recognition. On top of that, the film was drowning in bad buzz. There had been multiple re-writes, it was over budget and the key role of Wolverine was re-cast almost a month into filming by some unknown foreigner named Hugh Jackman.
After X-Men became a surprise hit, any and every superhero film got greenlit and the Era of Comic-Book Movie began.
4. The Real Cancun (2003)
People think of it as a pipe dream now but back in '03, the reality movie was very close to becoming an actual genre. The Real Cancun was getting a major release and another spring break film from the producer of The Bachelor was in the can and about to get a legit advertising push. Reality was graduating to the big screen. Of course, the Real Cancun was a complete bomb which led to the other spring break film getting shelved, and the megaplexes were saved from the Reality Invasion. But just think, if more people had gone to see The Real Cancum, The Simple Life could have been a film and we’d probably be seeing a Hills movie this summer.
6a. Tommy Boy (1995)/Billy Madison (1995)
Old School (2003) helped launch a new batch of Coming of Age comedies but these were the originals that helped pave the way. Like Apatow's films, these movies were not about the troubles of being in a relationship as much they are about men having to grow up to even be able to function in the real world.
6b. There's Something About Mary (1997)
Hollywood learned that a) gross and stupid sell and b) Dumb and Dumber wasn't a fluke. The R-rated comedy regained it's footing in Hollywood with Mary as the Farrelly Brothers showed that gross-out comedies could out-gross even the highest expectations. They laid the ground work with Dumb and Dumber but Mary was a hit both in the box office and with critics. Two years later, the floodgates would open after American Pie brought the gross out gags to the teen comedy.
7a. The Ice Storm (1997)
The Problems of the Upper Middle Class becomes High Art. In the ultimate post-modern shift, the people who drown themselves in hipster chic to escape the problems in their lives suddenly make their problems into hipster chic. I think Ang Lee's outsider sensibilities made this film better than the new wave of more self-indulgent films (The Savages, Margot at the Wedding) but I believe that this film helped set off the trend.
Personally, I wish that more filmmakers addressed the personal demons/community lashing out at whoever they can sentiment of 1997's "The Sweet Hereafter" as it resonates more with the current political climate. Instead, American Beauty took The Ice Storm mindset to the Oscars and it's been boo-hoo bourgeois ever since.
7b. Happiness (1998)
Mainstream appeal becomes the enemy. Happiness made no attempt to be liked and, in fact, was almost revelling in the fact that it wasn't for most people. This film was instrumental in the break of indie films from the mainstream. Before, people would whine "Oh I wish people could discover the truly great films like Drugstore Cowboy or Welcome to the Dollhouse." After "Happiness", it was no longer a problem if the mainstream didn't like the movie; instead it was like a badge of honor. The film mixed John Waters's audacity with the standard Young American Angst, making it more palatable to the every-hipster.
8. Scream (1996)
The horror movie would be brought back to life, opening the door for countless teen slasher films, classic horror remakes, and the torture porn movement. Films like Saw, House of 1000 Corpses and 28 Days Later may have directed the horror movement in new directions but none of it would have happened if not for Scream.
9. The Matrix (1999)
After this film, suddenly every action star knew some sort of martial-arts. Stylistically, it turned a new (and now much copied) page in the history of action and sci-fi films.
10. The Sixth Sense (1999)
Obviously, this film made the twist ending and creepy little kids en vogue but possibly the more important influence this film had was that it helped bring spooky back into a genre that had been over-run by slashers. People remembered that there was more to ghost stories and scary movies than just the shock of someone sneaking up behind a busty co-ed with an axe. You could have a spooky film without being a "horror" film.
11. Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels (1999)
While Tarantino focused on paying homage to his favorite genres, Guy Ritchie helped invent a new one. As Ebert wrote, "'Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels' is like Tarantino crossed with the Marx Brothers, if Groucho had been into chopping off fingers". While Tarantino's style (namely his wordy scripts and hip dialogue) had its moment in the sun, Ritchie's brand has become a staple of the megaplex. Just as the Marx Brothers influenced Looney Toons, Ritchie's film helped lead to the cartoonish actioners like The Transporter, Death Race, Layer Cake, Crank, Wanted, etc.
12. Friday (1995)/The Nutty Professor (1996)
After years of disappointing to middling box office returns from African-American-led urban dramas and rom-com’s, the new (and only) black film movement would be broad comedies.
13. Saving Private Ryan (1998)
Redefined the war film by making neo-realistic action the Gold Standard. More cynically, it masterfully mixed violence with a War is Hell message that made everything seem like it fit for a legit purpose and wasn't at all gratuitous.
14. Braveheart (1995)
The period epic becomes a viable genre again, opening the door for Gladiator, 300, and others.
15.Don't Be A Menace... (1996)
The precursor to the Scary Movie franchise, this film also was the unfortunate inspiration for Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer who've littered the theaters with one horrific film after another. This film also started the upsetting trend of making spoof movies that are loosely tied together bits that spoofed many different films/people.
16. Analyze This (1999)
Slumming ain't so bad. If the great Robert DeNiro can do a comedy, why can't Joan Allen pop up in Death Race? While the indie film was becoming more and more resistant to even being acknowledged by the mainstream, many of its former darlings started willfully signing on for silly films. "Analyze This" showed that the crossing over could be successful both in terms of quality and box office. The quality of these crossovers has pretty much declined ever since but that's not stopping anyone from cashing those paychecks.
17. Everest (1998)
The film that put Imax on the map.
18. Remember the Titans (2000)
If you’re watching a sports movie, odds are that it’s going to be some uplifting story of hope and faith. You can pretty much thank this film for bringing back the "Brian's Song" sentimentality to the mainstream sports film.
19. Chicago (2002)/Save the Last Dance (2001)
These are the films that saved song and dance. Chicago is obvious because of its 171 million dollars domestic take and Oscar win but Save the Last Dance was the film that paved the way for the recent spate of dance-centric films. Moulin Rouge! (2001) also deserves credit for helping to bring back the musical.
20. Traffic (2000)
While it's hardly the first film with interwoven storylines, the approach was perfected in Traffic. Nowadays, it seems like you can't make a political film without mixing it up (Babel, Fast Food Nation, Syriana, Lions for Lambs, the upcoming Crossing Over).

Honorable Mention: The Usual Suspects, Bottle Rocket/Kicking and Screaming/Flirting with Disaster, Dark City/City of Lost Children, Babe.
Hosting by Yahoo!

September 04, 2008

Casting the New Ghostbusters

Word has arrived that two writers from The Office are going to try their hand at crafting a sequel to "Ghostbusters". Original reports also mentioned that the movie could be about "a new group of ghoul chasers". So the next question is, who should play the new Ghostbusters?

Personally, I'm a fan of going in unexpected directions with casting. I'm really hoping that the next Batman features Tilda Swinton as The Riddler. For this reason, I'm not a fan of any of the "obvious" Hollywood choices like Owen Wilson, Ryan Reynolds, Jack Black, or Seth Rogen. Honestly, I might even consider casting three women.

So here are my choices (and character suggestions):

- The spiritual ghost buster who doesn't believe all ghosts are bad is Penelope Cruz. I know some people are annoyed by her but I thought she was very good in a rather dull film "Bandidas". She seems like a natural comic actress and she wouldn't look bad in a uniform or covered in slime. The Plan B would be James Franco, in a sort of soberly spiritual version of his Pineapple Express role.

- The gung-ho 'buster who thinks before he speaks, fights, or does anything at all would be played by Danny McBride. The one thing I'd like to change about McBride would be that he actually does know what he's doing but has a hair trigger. So far, he usually just plays dolts. I'd like this role to be someone who is intelligent but just gets caught up in the moment too often. With Plan B, I might actually go with Rachel McAdams or Craig Robinson.

- The "Egon", wise-cracking brainiac would be noneother than Amy Adams. I'm a huge fan of Adams but would like to see her in more films where she's herself or a regular woman. She played the nerd well in Talladega Nights but this role would give her more sass. I could also see Kristin Wiig in this role.

- The leading man. The spokeperson for the crew who sells the Ghostbusters to the public but is actually a bit of a coward would be played by James Marsden. The more obvious choice would be Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson but I'd like to give Marsden a shot. I think he is Franco-esque in the fact that his comic potential has yet to be utilized.

Now, I don't know if those are the character types that they will be going with but I wouldn't mind seeing a Cruz, McBride, Adams, Marsden lineup.

 
Hosting by Yahoo!

August 01, 2008

"The Brothers Blooms" from the makers of "Brick"

I wasn't a huge fan of Brick but this film looks good. Also, it's nice to see the mute girl from "Babel" getting some work.


Hosting by Yahoo!

July 07, 2008

From Failed Pilot to Classic Scene

On his site, Lee Goldberg has a very interesting piece about how acting/casting can make or break a show or film. Here is the famous restaurant scene from Heat.

And here's the same scene 6 years earlier from the Michael Mann pilot "LA Takedown".

Needless to say, one of these version was popular and one didn't see the light of day.
Hosting by Yahoo!

May 20, 2008

One of my favorite shows on TV

I'm a huge fan of the AMC show Shootout that airs on Sundays at 11. It usually offers some great interviews. There are some decent clips on the AMC website although you'll probably be sick of Queen's "You're My Best Friend" after a few of them since the Carnival cruise line ad plays over and over. Still, it's a definition recommendation for the DVR.
Here are a couple of clips. Denzel Washington on his interesting negotiations with Harvey Weinstein and Patricia Clarkson on the current state of indie film.


Hosting by Yahoo!