Adonal?
So the Warriors have bought out Adonal Foyle and the Colgate alum would seem to be a solid choice to fill the bench in Beantown. But do we really need him? True, I'd prefer him to Scot Pollard but since Pollard is signed, sealed, and delivered, are the owners really going to go after Foyle, who could possibly relegate Pollard to the inactive list? And if we were going to do that, wouldn't it have been wiser to combine the amounts of those two contracts and gone after someone a bit better?
Also, I still feel that the bigger need is at the swing spot. We need to bring someone in who can defend or at the very least be able to give Ray Allen and Paul Pierce a breather now and then so they don't have to play 40 minutes a game.
Adonal Foyle is an addition that I don't think anyone can be upset over but if the choice is between Adonal or a swingman, I'd vote that we pass on Foyle and give Pierce and Allen some backup.
