« CAN! YOU! DIGGIT! | Main | Still Curious? Here's How They Did It. »

Respond/React: "He's Just Not That Into You"

If the terms "perfectly charming" or "adorably fun" should ever be used (and I'm really questioning whether I should have just typed them) they should be used to describe "He's Just Not That Into You". The film is the epitome of cute even though most of the film is more rejection comedy than romantic comedy. Ginnifer Goodwin is going to have a lot more fans after this one and Kevin Connolly and Bradley Cooper could be able to spin this into a shot at a leading role.

That being said, you pretty much already know whether or not you'll like this movie. If you like rom-coms, you'll like this film. It's one of the better pure romantic comedies (as opposed to the Apatow coming of age stories) to come out in some time. It doesn't, however, transcend the genre and for every couple of laughs, there's a moment that will have ladies breathing "Aaaaw!" and lads belching "Ugh." If you don't like schmaltz, this film is not for you. If you are so-so on rom-coms then I'd recommend renting this; I liked it but there's no reason to make time to go see it in the theater.

It's essentially the XX chromosome version of "Taken". It delivers what its audience desires and makes little-to-no attempt to mask the fact that it's a genre film with a specific audience.

For a more detailed and spoiler-filled reaction to the movie, read on.

OK, first off, what's up with Ben Affleck's teeth. Maybe it's because I can't shake the scene from "Man About Town" in which he gets terrible veneers but his teeth looks screwy and he is almost worryingly gaunt in the film. The Star could use pictures from this film to make up a cancer story about Affleck (or at least a manorexic headline).

That aside, the film is half great, half groan. Part of that was the structure. I'm a big fan of slice of life movies and don't feel the need to always have an overriding story or destination towards which every character moves but those films are hard to pull off. In this case, they weren't able to make it work. In fact, while the first half of the films was fairly "Day in the Life" style, the second half relied on numerous momentous events (the heart attack, the sex in the office, the spurned advance/inability to function in any way, shape, or form, buying the house). The first half of the film watched relationships unfold naturally; the second half showed what happens in contrived situations.

The moment the film switches gears is obvious. When Ginnifer Goodwin's Gigi throws herself at Justin Long's Alex and he turns her down, you could almost hear a record scratch (or in the case of rom-com's, the cliched string/piano music). After that, the film because just another schmaltz fest and, honestly, almost slipped into parody a few times. If, during the second half of the film, you took a shot for every scene scored by soft strings/piano music, you'd probably be into hugging your toilet. 

The second half of the movie also undoes every strength from the first half of the film and, in the end, further strengthens the misguided teachings that it disected in the beginning. The idea that Bradley Cooper is the lying bad guy, Justin Long was a nice guy in hiding, Drew Barrymore's love was right under her nose, Scarlett Johannson is a bimbo, Jennifer Connolly is happy alone, only relationships built on ultimatums fold,  etc. are just as misguided messages as the mom's advice in the opening.

Again, the turn was the moment when Gigi hits on Alex. Up to that point, Alex had been a womanizer. His reaction to a girl jumping on him would not have been to push her away and go off on a monologue about relationships. If anything, he would have banged her and used the monologue the next morning as a reason for her not to call him. And you know what, if he did actually like her, that would have made things all the more interesting since the sex, rejection, and emotions would have been realer AND more dramatic. It would have been messy but if love and relationships are anything, it's messy. Instead, Long pushes her away, turns out to be the exceptional guy who is really a nice person despite all the notches on his headboard. The movie had a chance to be intriguing but instead opted for strings, pianos, and happily ever after.

But of course, that's why the film was made. It wasn't trying to be an honest film about the intricacies of human relationships. It was just a sugary confection designed to make women swoon and it was a definite success at that. I heard more than a handful of gasps and sighs from the ladies in the theater.

When all is said and done, the film is cute enough and had some great moments but it is what it is. It's a very well made film but one that isn't really all that memorable.


Hosting by Yahoo!

Comments

I responded to NY Times reviewer Manohla Dargis's review. It might have been a better (and more succinct) version of my blog post. Thought I'd post it here.

(SPOILERS)

Half great, half groan

The first half was screwball and silly but I thought it was funny/cute enough so I overlooked the issues. The second half devolved into complete schmaltz and almost self-parody. Even worse, the film basically ends up selling the same silly cliches/beliefs that it claimed to despise in the opening monologue.

At the same time, it's not like the guys in this film were a bunch of progressive, pro-XY characters. There was the lying cad, the blockhead with an illogical commitment to \"principles\", the sap who's hung up on an ex, and the womanizer who doesn't know his emotions until the woman literally scolds them out of him. (Oh, and there's also the three laughably terrible, freeloading husbands.)

Let's be honest, when dealing with love and affection, we're all basically willing victims. Not to the over-the-top extent portrayed in this film but victims still. This film had a chance to really delve into the messiness that is dating and marriage but opted for being another saccharine confection that so many people love even if it isn't good for them. Hell, it's not much different from the disinterested guys the film is inspired by. Yeah, filmgoers can do better but people just find this familiar, comfortable, and amusing enough. This film is the rule, not the exception.

And for the sake of discussion, what are some stronger female-centric rom-coms? Citing Thelma and Louise is a bit of a cop-out since that films not a rom-com.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

filmrank0220.jpg
022109.jpg