« December 2008 | Main | February 2009 »

January 30, 2009

Weekend Small Talk: The Decade's Guiltiest

Every decade has it's guilty pleasures; films that you know you shouldn't like but watch anyway. Often times, they are films that are in a genre you usually don't enjoy or are just films that are so bad that you feel ashamed and hate admiting that you like them. Often times, people overextend the definition to include films that most people enjoy. A film like "The Devil Wears Prada" doesn't fit because it's a quality film and has basically transcended its chick-flick pedigree. On the other hand, "Just My Luck" starring Lindsay Lohan transcends nothing, doesn't even devolve into camp, and is a film that relies on pure cutesiness to get by. It's not one of my top 10 guilty pleasures but it and "The Big Bounce" get honorable mentions because of the fact that I've actually tried to watch them on multiple occassions.

So what are the top ten films from the Aughts that I probably aught not admit to enjoying as much as I do?

10. Live Free or Die Hard: I was really torn about putting this on the list because I think it was one of the better films of 2007. But then I realized that I just wrote that one of the top films of 2007 featured: Bruce Willis walking on a jet wing, shooting a helicopter down with a car, and running a car through multiple walls and then into 90 pound Maggie Q... and she shrugs it off. The movie takes the ridiculousness of past Die Hard films and then multiplies them by a logic usually saved for "Heroes" or "Cannonball Run". I've also watched the film entirely too many times so I had to give it a spot on the list.

This film also features the Y2K Guilty Pleasure President, Justin Long. He's had an amazing run of films that are enjoyable but extremely flawed/just not that good: Dodgeball, Waiting..., Accepted, Idiocracy, Strange Wilderness, etc.

9. Gossip: This isn't a good movie yet I always find myself stopping to watch whenever it's on cable. I really can't explain why. Part of me tries to figure out where the film went wrong or if it ever went right. It does feature three of the more magnetic actors: James Marsden, Josh Jackson, and Norman Reedus (three guys who'll almost always get me to stop and see what movie they're in) but it also features their polar opposite, Kate Hudson, whom I usually can't turn the channel away from fast enough. Another part of me tries to remember how the film ends, then thinks "No, I must be remembering it wrong, it can't end like that." only to find that it does indeed end in an unbelievably ridiculous, cliched fashion. It's a stretch to call this a guilty "pleasure" but even though I know it's terrible, I still watch. It's also the epitome of a movie you'll watch until the commercial, then turn away at the break and completely forget that you were ever watching it.

8. The Covenant: I'll admit to having a bit of a crush on Laura Ramsey (and have had one since "The Real Cancun") so that's one thing it's got going for it. The next is that a few of the actors hang out at the local watering hole that I frequent so that adds an odd familiarity to it. I could come up with other reasons but what they all add up to is the fact that there's really no reason to watch this film and absolutely no legitimate rationale behind watching it more than once, as I have. I was surprised to find that the film was directed by Renny Harlin but it makes sense. With this and "Mindhunters", he has two of the more stupid yet watchable films of the decade.

On a side note, how the hell did Renny Harlin get to be so big? He did two sequels (Nightmare on Elm Street 4 and Die Hard 2), the bomb that is Adventures of Ford Fairlane, and the surprise success Cliffhanger. Who thought after those four movies that they should give him a hundred million dollars to make Cutthroat Island?

7. Jackass - The Movie: I'm sorry but I probably laughed more in this film than any movie I've seen this decade. I'm not sure what that says about me but I really think it's impossible to watch the doctor react to the X-Ray of a matchbox car in Steve-O's ass and not laugh out loud.

6. John Tucker Must Die: How can you not love a film with a guy named Fatso-Fasano in it? And no, that's not a character name, that's the actor's name. The film also features Gossip Girl's Penn Badgley as a kind of alt-nice guy which is interesting because he's a whiny brat in Gossip Girl (which would probably be #1 in my TV guilty pleasures list). Part of me wonders why John Tucker would ever stray from a slutty Sophia Bush, especially for Ashanti, Brittany Snow, and the girl that looks like my buddy's ex-girlfriend, but that's beside the point I guess. The point is... well, I'm not sure. Maybe that's why I keep checking it out when it's on.

5. The Wicker Man: I had no interest in watching this film until I watched this bit on Youtube.

Needless to say, after that I HAD to watch it. And you know what, it wasn't THAT bad. OK, I used the fast forward button liberally and wasn't really paying attention but the moments of sheer lunacy almost make up for the long stretches of boredom. 

SPOILER WARNING: I also like director Neil LaBute's take on it: "People seemed to think that we didn't get it when Nicolas Cage was running around in a bear suit--I know when something is funny. The great thing is that no matter how many women he hits and kicks, how silly it is that he disguises himself as a bear, we still put the guy inside the Wicker Man and burn him to death. The movie takes a pretty sober turn and that was half the fun of it for me. Always stay a step ahead of the audience and whack them across the knuckles whenever possible." Once you realize that was the illogical approach they took when making the film, it is fun to watch.

4. Sky High: This is a fun teen movie but it's gets the #5 slot because it brings out the creepy uncle in me. I'm sorry but if you say a high school movie with Mary Elizabeth Winstead, a redhead, and an Asian-looking chick, I say SOLD! On top of that, it features Michael Angarano (aka the Fake Shia LeBeouf), Linda Carter, Dave Foley, and Bruce Campbell, Kelly Preston, and Kurt Russell. Whatever, I like it, deal with it.

3. Failure to Launch: It's almost like someone said, let's take "How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days", make the plot even more implausible and then cast the only woman in America whom the male species finds more annoying than Kate Hudson, and fuck it, let's put Terry Bradshaw in there as well. And we'll give it to the director of "Showtime", the movie nobody remembers Eddie Murphy and Robert DeNiro ever made. Yet it works. Zooey Deschanel is great, Bradley Cooper does his Bradley Cooper thing, and somehow I snap out of a 90 minute trance wondering why I just watched the movie again.

2. Stick It: It should comes as a shock to nobody that this film was written and directed by the same person who wrote "Bring It On". This self-rip-off might only have been rivaled by the "Legally Blonde" writers churning out "The House Bunny". And while I'll defend "Bring It On" as an interesting tween flick, "Stick It" is just too ridiculous. Yeah, I still defend it but I don't feel good about myself when I do. Yet just as I still get a smirk out of "This isn't a cheerocracy!", I'll admit that "They don't call it gymNICEtics" still gets one of those half-groan/half-giggles out of me.

1. 2001 Maniacs: This campy horror film stars Robert Englund ("Nightmare on Elm Street") and boobs (wet dream from childhood). If you don't have time or the desire to watch the film, you basically get the whole thing in the trailer.

I realy thought twice about posting this film which is why it had to be #1 on the list.


So what are your guilty pleasure of the Aughts?

Review: Taken

Ho. Lee. Shit. "Taken" starring Liam Neeson as a retired "preventer" (aka absolute shit kicker), is a throwback to the old days of no apologies action films. This film is like "The Transporter" except the replaced the cheesy, over-the-top action with utter brutality. If a parent or human rights group sees this movie, they'll shit a brick. This is the kind of films that kids love and parents despise. My blood was racing after the film ended. They don't make films like this anymore. (Click below to read more on "Taken")

Now don't get me wrong, the film is hardly flawless. The villains have laughably bad aim. Neeson successfully impersonates a French policeman despite the fact that he's speaking English the whole time. You definitely need to turn your brain off and go along for the ride but good lord, what a ride. There's one scene in particular that I think will be a shoo-in for the top five scenes of 2009.

On a side note, either they did a Benjamin Button effect on Maggie Grace or the make-up people are wizards but she looked ten years younger in this. 

That random thought aside, if you like bare knuckle action films, you HAVE to see "Taken". It's the kind of film during which you don't mind if people say "Oh shit" or "Goddamn!" out loud because you were almost going to say the same thing. This isn't a film like Bourne that transcends the genre; it exemplifies the genre and revels in it.  I've probably now hyped it up to much but, whatever, I loved it.

---

On a more serious note, I can't believe that this film is PG-13. Not that I think it's going to scar children if they see it but if "Slumdog Millionaire" is R and "Zack and Miri Make a Porno" was almost NC-17, then I'm not sure how a film this brutal can be considered fun for (almost) the whole family.  You can actually see the cuts that were made in this film to satisfy the MPAA - you don't see people getting shot; you see a gun go off and then you see someone fall over. But if they even came close to insinuating sex like they did the killing and torture in this film, the film would be NC-17 or, at best, a hard R. I honestly wouldn't be stunned if we started hearing parental groups start complaining again about violence in movies because this and The Dark Knight are starting to push the envelope (and the Democrats are in charge of the government) but even still, the way violence is treated in comparison to sex is laughable.

Of course, it's not like I can get on my high horse or anything because I loved this movie so take what I said for what it's worth and (if you like old school, bare-knuckle action films) go see "Taken".

January 29, 2009

The Tryout: Return of The Chef

Found this over at Vulture and had to post it. Nice to hear Raekwon back again with Ghostface on a riff of the old Criminology beat (which makes sense as the title of the song is "Criminology 2". It's nothing mind blowing but just a nice throwback to the days of real hip hop.

January 28, 2009

Rom-Com Cliches

I'm not sure how into "He's Just Not That Into You" I am but I definitely appreciated this little webshort that they made promoting the film. It runs through ten cliches that won't be in the film (although the trailer does have the sassy best friend and possibly a guy trying on different shirts for a date so who knows if there's any truth in this advert). As a fan of rom-coms, I'm probably 60-40 against this film because I have a feeling it's going to annoy me. If I'm that hard up for a rom-com, I'll probably just rewatch "Love Actually". And throw any names at me that you want but that's a great movie.

Cowrite: Next 10 Pages

Well, the first Cowrite screenplay competition winners were announced and it wasn't me. As I said in my first post about this, I wasn't really expecting to win. My pages weren't all that great. After reading the winners pages, I was disappointed since they aren't that good but structurally, they did what the producers wanted. They introduced the characters, the main conflict, and left us on a bit of a cliffhanger. Personally, I still like my pages better but I can see why they weren't selected. Congrats to the victors!

So this brings us to the next 10 pages. I banged out 12 pages last night. Pretty good. Very standard with some been there. done that to it but pretty good, if I do say so myself. Some funny stuff although they may be more R rated than the producers want. I screwed up the time of day a bit, going from night to evening to night when it should be night the whole time. Also, my cliffhanger is essentially the same thing as the first 10 pages. The situation is similar yet completely different but they're still pretty damn similar. Maybe too much. Not sure if I'm going to spend the time writing another entry and tossing away another ten bucks but I'd like to try my hand at something more PG rated to see where I could go with it. But since I have other projects I'm working on, I doubt I'll do it.

January 27, 2009

The Tryout: Trey Green

While I'm not sure I get the buzz around Animal Collective, I can tell you that I totally get the lovefest around up and coming indie rocker phenomenigmanlymachineoflove known as Trey Green. How do I know? Well, I went to high school with him. All bias aside... No, I like my bias on this one. So take a listen over on the side and then buy four or five albums and share them with your friends. Well, share the word with your friends, not the albums; they have to buy their own.

Check out the website over here.

There's also a link to his latest forey into visual audio sciences in the Watch It section (lower right).

Enjoy.

January 26, 2009

The First SoulHonky Facebook Movie Quiz

After taking far too many easy Facebook movie quizzes, I decided to try my hand and creating one of my own. The actual facebook quiz can be found if you search quizzes for Soulhonky.com. That version has multiple choice options for each answer. Here, I've removed that (mostly for space reasons).

So here it goes.

1. Which of these famous roles wasn't originally offered to (and turned down by) James Caan?
* Superman in Superman
* Chief Brody in Jaws
* Ted Kramer in Kramer vs. Kramer
* Det. Doyle in The French Connection
* Col. Lucas in Apocalypse Now

2. What was the original title of Pixar's "Cars"?

3, How was Little Shop of Horrors supposed to end?

4. Josh Brolin was initially rejected after auditioning for which movie?
* No Country for Old Men
* The Goonies
* W.
* Milk
* American Gangster

5. What actress appeared on TV in a homemade Catwoman costume in hopes of convincing producers to cast her in Batman Returns?

6. What was Leonardo DiCaprio's reason for turning down the role of Neo in "The Matrix"?

7. Adrien Brody spent months working on this Academy Award nominated film but then found out, at the screening, that his lead role had been cut to just a few minutes of screen time.

8. Had "The Natural" been faithful to the novel on which it was based, how would it have ended?

9. Jodie Foster left David Fincher's "The Game" over creative differences; who replaced her?

10. Which movie did Francis Ford Coppola agree to make because he needed money to save his winery?

11. This SNL star was originally slated to be the star of 30 Rock (the role was rewritten for Jane Krakowski)

12. What actor wanted to direct Frost/Nixon but was turned down by the playwright?

13. This actor was supposed to play Linus in Ocean's 11?

14. Recently, an acclaimed director was asked if he wanted to make a sequel to his most famous film. His response: "I would have less interest in that than I would in having cigarettes put out in my eyes."
Name the director and film.

15. What was the original title of M. Night Shymalan's "The Happening"?

Here are the answers.

1. To my knowledge, Chief Brody was never offered to James Caan, who is infamous in many Hollywood circles because of his history of turning down great roles.

2. "Cars" was originally called "Route 66". The title was changed to avoid confusion with the old TV show of the same name.

3, The original ending of Little Shop of Horrors had Audrey II (the plant) eat Seymour and Audrey. Then an army of plants takes over NYC. Seriously.


4. Josh Brolin was initially rejected after auditioning for No Country for Old Men.


5. Google Sean Young Catwoman and there's a video of her talkshow performance in the homemade Catwoman suit. Annette Bening was actually originally cast as Catwoman but had to drop out because she was pregnant.

6. After Titanic, Leo wasn't sure he wanted to do another FX heavy movie so he turned down "The Matrix". After toying with the idea of "American Psycho", opted for Danny Boyle's "The Beach instead."

7. Adrien Brody was told he was going to carry Terrence Malick's Thin Red Line but ended up having two lines and five minutes of screen time. He was disappointed, especially since he had been doing press appearances for a movie he wasn't in.

8. Robert Redford's character Roy Hobbs doesn't hit a home run at the end of "The Natural". In the novel, he strikes out.

9. Jodie Foste was replaced by Sean Penn. Reports were that Foster (who was 33 at the time) signed up to play Michael Douglas's daughter. The 51 year old Douglas, and apparently others, wanted her to play his sister. The role was rewritten as Douglas's brother and given to Sean Penn.

10. The Godfather Pt. 3 came about because Coppola needed money for his winery.

11. Rachel Dratch was originally slated to be the star of 30 Rock (the role was rewritten for Jane Krakowski)

12. George Clooney. wanted to direct Frost/Nixon but was turned down by the playwright.

13. Mark Wahlberg signed on to play Linus but left the film because he was the filming dates conflicted with his shoot dates for Tim Burton's "Planet of the Apes".

14. David Fincher said that when asked about the prospects of a sequel to Se7en.

15. The Green Effect. He passed that script around Hollywood, got rejected by everyone, and then reworked it and it became The Happening.

January 24, 2009

Cinesomnia: The Missouri Breaks

I can't sleep so I thought I might as well post, and watch, a forgotten moment in film history. I can't say this is a great movie or even a very good one but it is the only on-screen pairing of two classic American actors and good friends, Jack Nicholson and Marlon Brando.

The film is "The Missouri Breaks" and stands out for one scene (when Nicholson barges in on Brando in a bubble bath" that Jack said was a humbling experience because no matter what he did, he was upstaged by Marlon. It also is notable for the fact that Brando was really going off of the deep end and demanded that he play the hired gun as a kind of schizo-dresser (he's always the same guy but wears all sorts of different clothes from a dress to a [riest's habit). One last factoid: the bug in the mouth scene was improvised. The director loved it and had Marlon do it for the following takes, something which didn't sit well with Randy Quaid, who wasn't particularly happy about getting a bug stuck in his mouth time and time again.

So there you have it. Sit back and enjoy "The Missouri Breaks".

January 23, 2009

Weekend Small Talk: Best Directors

This year's Oscar race puts together five great directors, only one of whom is ever in the great director of his generation discussion (and even then, a lot of people aren't fans of Ron Howard). But since it's that time of year, who do you consider the best of the lot: Ron Howard, Gus Van Sant, Danny Boyle, David Fincher, or Stephen Daldry. And for the sake of argument, let's add snubee Chris Nolan into the mix.

Who's work do you prefer? How would you rank them?

Here's the SoulHonky rankings:

NR. Stephen Daldry: People might scoff at his inclusion here but the guy has made three films and gotten nominated for Best Director three times. I have to give Daldry the NR (not rated) because I actually haven't seen any of his movies: The Reader, The Hours, and Billy Elliot.

5. Gus Van Sant: Gus Van Sant fans will probably cry foul but since I can not count myself amongst their lot, I think Guys gets the #5 spot. Yes, I loved "Good Will Hunting" but I also think "Elephant" is one of the worst movies ever made. It's in a tight race with "Baby Boy" (a discussion for another day). While I enjoyed "Milk" and some of his other films, his missteps outnumber his great films and when he's bad, he's basically unwatchable.

4. Ron Howard: I was recently told that to understand the problem with 21st Century Hollywood all one has to do is look at USC. At USC, I was informed, almost everyone wants to be Ron Howard. They want to make mainstream movies, completely inoffensive and predictable, that are aimed at making money. There's a lack of passion, daring, innovation, etc. For the most part, I think it's a decent call when it comes to Howard. His films are fairly formulaic. He got his start on fun trifles like "Splash", "Cocoon", "Night Shift", and "Parenthood". He then moved onto bigger budgeted popcorn films like "Apollo 13", "The Beautiful Mind", and "The DaVinci Code". While I know he won awards for "Mind", I was never a huge fan of that film and I don't think it's a very memorable movie.

However, I would argue that the problem isn't that people want to be like Ron Howard, it's that they are failing. Sure, "Gung Ho" and "Backdraft" look pretty silly today but they were well made, very engaging popcorn films. They actually coupled characters with the action scenes. Personally, too many films today rely on effects to give the films any heft or the audience any reason to keep watching. So while he might be at the #4 spot, this isn't a slight. Ron Howard is a great Hollywood director. But, in my opinion, he's also unquestionably behind the Top 3 of his list.

Now it gets tough.

3. Christopher Nolan: I have to be honest, I wasn't really blown away by either Batman film. Now don't get me wrong, they are both very good films but they aren't films that I would put on my All-Time Favorites list. Personally, I'd only put both a notch above The Prestige. Some people will take that as hate but I really liked The Prestige and think all the films are expertly crafted. Still though, if you are talking the best of Nolan, I go with Memento. Nolan is one of the best director to emerge this decade (if we overlook his little seen first film "The Following" which was from the late 90's), but right now he's #3 on this list.

2. David Fincher: Fincher BARELY sneaks past Nolan and that's primarily because (unlike most people) I don't consider The Dark Knight and Batman Begins to be "great" films. I've had my issues with Fincher's films but I think "Se7en" is an undeniable All-Time Classic, "Fight Club" is up there, and I personally think "The Game" is a forgotten gem. I didn't love "Zodiac" but it was very effective and was probably the best telling of a story that is filled with ancillary characters and no satisfying conclusion. "Benjamin Button" is vastly overrated but I think that movie is absolutely carried by Fincher's direction. The story isn't really all that great; if the film wasn't crafted masterfully, it would have been panned. But that's basically my biggest beef with Fincher; he keeps choosing scripts that aren't really that strong and he doesn't really improve them. He does an amazing job turning them into films but "Button", "Panic Room", "Zodiac", and "Alien3" were all somewhat hollow. Techinically amazing but incomplete filmgoing experiences.

1. Danny Boyle: Many people might disagree with my #1 selection (hell, I could wake up tomorrow and chage my mind) but as of right now, I have to go with Danny Boyle as my choice for the #1 spot. For starters, I give him a lot of credit for versatility. He's pretty much stayed away from typecasting himself by venturing into almost every genre available. Granted, sometimes he reaches out and misses badly ("A Life Less Ordinary" and "Sunshine") but even those were somewhat interesting messes. "Sunshine" in particular was extremely well made but then suffered from a shockingly odd third act twist that turned the sci-fi film into a slasher flick. I'm not a huge fan of "The Beach" but it has its moments. Still, his successes more than overshadow those missteps.

"Shallow Grave" is a terrific thriller that is a throwback to the day when emotions trumped explosions. "Trainspotting" captured an era and the drug culture almost perfectly. "28 Days Later" not only revived the zombie genre but brought it to the mainstream. Again, it took the usually blood soaked genre and added some humanity to it. I have yet to see Millions so I didn't count it but I've heard nothing but good things about it as well. Finally "Slumdog Millionaire" was a film about destiny that I actually enjoyed. When I saw "It was Written" as one of the options at the start of the film, I immediately groaned. I will readily admit that it's a personal issue but I see destiny in films as a cop-out more than inspiring. I almost groaned out loud when I saw the butterfly tattoo during "I Am Legend". "Slumdog", however, had me hook, line, and sinker and I happily went along for the bumpy ride. Now, I don't think it was a perfect movie and would put it in the same "very good but not great" column as "The Dark Knight" but considering the story line, the setting, and use of non- or new actors, it was an amazing directorial feat.

Maybe you agree, maybe you hate me, but if you ever come up dry in a conversation this weekend, don't be afraid to toss this question out and see if it can spark up a discussion.

Become a Fan on Facebook

My boredom drove me to create a fanpage of the one and only www.soulhonky.com on Facebook. If you want to announce your love, hate, or use of the site for procrastination purposes, search www.soulhonky.com on Face book or just click here to get to the fanpage.

And if you think I never give you anything, I recommend checking out WWTDD for some pictures of the lovely Olga Kurylenko. (Ladies, well, yeah, I don't really give you anything.)

The Rip-Off: Forrest Gump Style

OK, I wouldn't call Ben Button really a rip-off of Forrest Gump because the premise is completely different but this video from Talk Show with Spike Feresten is pretty spot on. Although the weird black dude should have been the pigmy, not Taraji P. Henson's dude.

January 22, 2009

Comment Confusion

I started getting some spam comments so I turned up the comments filter but it's now been brought to my attention that legit comments were getting junked as well. Apologies to those people whose comment were either delayed or deleted. (Both of you).

I'm still working on this so if you comment doesn't pop up immediately either give it some time or e-mail me at admin@soulhonky.com.

Oscars and Why I Don't Care

I think I officially stopped caring about the Oscars when Ellen Burstyn didn't win Best Actress for Requiem for a Dream. Maybe it was before that when Al Pacino beat Denzel Washington's Malcolm X for Best Actor. Either way, I'm always stunned that people get so upset when Oscar nominations come out and their faves get snubbed. People didn't see "The Reader" getting so much love but Harvey Weinstein called it; he knew he could get the film some noms based on the film's producers, Anthony Minghella and Sidney Pollack, both who passed away recently. While that seems crass, and it is, it's also how the Oscars work. People expected "Gran Torino" to get noticed, pretty much because it was Clint Eastwood. But really, "Changeling" always looked like the better Oscar contender. Just because it wasn't that good shouldn't make people forget about it.

And while people can complain all they want, sometimes you have to give Oscar voters credit for the insight.

The aforemention Pacino vs. Denzel made sense; Al Pacino's career has gone into steady decline since the Oscar and the voters were right to think that that would be the last time they'd be able to give him an even mildly legit trophy (while Denzel had his whole career in front of him). Similarly, Hollywood gave Roberts the award because they wanted to crown their favorite leading lady and when else was she going to get a real shot.

For this year, that could give David Fincher, the man Ed Norton once compared to Stanley Kubrick ("Kubrick didn't die, he just moved to Silverlake"), a shot at the gold for direction. Heath Ledger's tragic death will battle Robert Downey Jr's thrilling comeback for supporting actor. Mickey Rourke's return vs. a vote for Gay Right, I mean, Sean Penn in Milk?

Hollywood-types also like to think that they are above commercial fodder and, you know, being entertainment so they often overlook the more popcorn films. People can point out that light hearted fare and crowd pleasers got noms in the past but that's also because there were fewer films out back then. Now that more than 600 films come out a year, there's enough art house material to choose between.

And in the end, aren't we all just usually caught up in the hype? In high school, the question was "Pulp or Gump" but the picture with the most lasting appeal (and now the one I'd dub best picture) was "The Shawshank Redemption". 

If there's one person who should really be upset about the results, it's whatever network is airing the show. With no Dark Knight, the broadcast just lost its main draw and I doubt Hugh Jackman will be able to save the declining ratings.

Review: Lie to Me

Fox's new show "Lie to Me" is another spin on the ol' Psych/Mentalist observation highway. Tim Roth's character is an expert at facial tics and body movements and can tell if anyone is lying. He has used this skill to build his own rather impressive looking company and has high profile clientele and the ear of high ranking justice officials. And while he is able tell if anyone is lying, the key, as Kelli Williams's character explains to us, is finding out why they are lying.

The show is somewhat interesting (if the little factoids are indeed true) because it drops all sorts of little clues as to why someone is lying. In a lot of cases, it's a little too obvious but hey, it's network television not a documentary. Still, the idea that someone's nose really does itch when they lie or their hands get colder when they are about to flee is kind of neat.

Of course, you can't build a show around "kind of neat" and that's where "Lie to Me" gets into trouble. Trouble being a relative term because, for many people, all they want is a standard procedural and that's exactly what this is. EW's Ken Tucker put it best in his review: "Lie to Me is derivative yet well crafted, predictable yet ever-so-slightly novel."

But for people looking for a little more than the usual, the show struggles because it lacks a hook. Yes, the science is "neat" and sure, not everyone trusts Roth's character (he apparently ran into some trouble in the past) but he's a well-to-do big shot with a seemingly infallible talent who has enough people's ears that he can get what he wants.  His character needs a fatal flaw or someone to play against. While I like Kelli Williams (best known for her days on "The Practice), her character is more like a Robin to his Batman than a Scully to his Mulder. There's no real conflict. They just go about their casework, utilizing their gift of observation as they please. The characters are so bland that I can't remember their names and wouldn't be surprised if most people referred to them as Mr. Orange and that lady from the Practice.

The more intriguing element, which they touch on a little bit, is life outside of work. We've seen what it's like to be a super-observant person in pursuit of a crime but what about when you're at home, on a date, watching a couple of friends talking? Can you turn it off? When do you tell someone that their loved one is lying to them? What do you do when you know your daughter's lying to you?

"Lie to Me" has promise but, if it was up to be, I'd focus more on how his ability is a gift in the workplace but an absolute curse in his personal life. I also wouldn't have him be so successful. He should be more of a broken soul. Have him be able to tell who is lying but not so good at finding out why. Give that ability to his partner. Let them butt heads. Make it a bit like Burn Notice meets Pushing Daisies. A guy has a gift but he needs to rely on his friends to help best utilize it.

This is exactly the kind of show that people should sit out the first season, wait to hear if it is any good, and if it is, netflix the first season in order to catch up before season 2 begins. The problem with that, of course, is that if everyone sits out season 1, the ratings won't be good enough to merit a season 2. Oh well. It's hard to get bent out of shape by the possible cancellation of yet another formulaic crime show.

January 21, 2009

Twitter?

So SoulHonky.com now has a Twitter page. Feel free to become a follower or comment or do whatever it is people do with Twitter. I'm trying to figure out exactly what the point is or how it's different from status updates on Facebook or how I became so old that I have no idea what Twitter and Lady Gaga are yet think both should be kept away from children.

We'll see how this goes or how long it lasts.

Cowrite: First 10 Pages

I have to say, I'm a bit disappointed with my attempt at the first ten pages of the COWRITE contest. I liked my set-up but the jokes just weren't there and I barely got through introducing the characters in the first 12 pages. Also, I have no idea where it would head, which can't be a good thing. Well, in this case it could be what they're looking for since the next ten pages would have a lot of room to work with but I can't say I'm at all confident in my chances of winning round one. Here's one example of the lame jokes that populate my first 10.

I couldn't get the scrippets function to work so if for some reason you want to check out my foray into the Cowrite contest, you can just click HERE.

January 20, 2009

The Rip-Off: Se7en Style

I've long been a supporter of the rip-off over the remake. What I mean is that people should just rip-off movies and tweak them a bit so they seem different rather than remaking them outright. Die Hard was followed by a number of rip-offs: Die Hard on a bus (Speed), Die Hard on a boat (Under Siege), etc. A more recent example was the original The Fast and The Furious which was essentially Point Break with cars instead of surfboards; hijackings instead of bank heists. Flightplan was basically The Lady Vanishes on a plane instead of a train and with the disappearing person being the hero's son, not just a recent acquaintance.
In order for the rip-off to work, there needs to be enough difference so fans of your movie can plausibly deny that its a copy of another movie (Also, so the lawyers will be able to defend the film against any plagiarism charges). When a film fails to do that, it just looks like the filmmakers made a lousy remake. For instance, Disturbia was basically seen as a remake of Rear Window except by the writers who claimed that their work was wholly original. Another example is the trailer for Horseman, or what should probably be called "Four".

The Tryout: Animal Collective

l.jpg To many in the indie music arena, Animal Collective's latest album, Merriweather Post Pavilion is the most anticipated album of the year. Some reviewers are already calling the Album of the Year race over and handing it to this release. I myself have never been able to get into Animal Collective but who knows, maybe this will be the album to get me into them. We shall see.

EDIT: Nope, still don't get it. Summertime Clothes is catchyish but I can't say I'm a fan of singer's voice. I'd like to hear a Spoon cover of that song. I'm not sure what instruments or filters they use but thy literally gave me a headache. I'd rather not listen to it ever again.

January 19, 2009

The Fanboy Era

In terms of American big studio films, The Aughts has been a lackluster decade. One reason I think that is so is because this has been The Era of the Fanboys. Now, don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with fanboys. Also, fanboys in this case doesn't just mean sci-fi fans or horror groupies. People can blame the blogosphere for "Snakes on a Plane" but internet scuttlebutt also got "The Women" a wider (and equally undeserved) release. And the biggest fanboys are arguably the Sundance/indie crowd; how many films have they "loved" that then came out and not only tanked but just weren't that good? While fanboys often bemoan the fact that their genres are watered down too much for public consumption, indie fans revel in the fact that most people don't want to sit through their films.

The problem as I see it is that the studios' focus of fanboy affection is on the ancillary elements of a beloved genre and those elements are held in higher regard than the need for strong stories and compelling characters. Horror films became torture porn or completely campy. Actions films have become a collection of over-the-top set pieces and explosions. Comedy became raunch. In a fairly interesting twist, women were pushed out as chick flicks were no longer female dreams of finding true love; they were male coming-of-age fantasies. Thrillers are all but dead since those seem to require actual craftsmanship. Art House films are almost comically focused on the self-absorbed pain and anguish hidden in ordinary households. Today, the artsier films don't pretend to even consider having a mainstream appeal while mainstream films mostly gave up the idea that they could insterest the masses without being the lowest common denominator. In terms of quality, I think this decade has been carried by foreign films and documentaries.

I also don't think it's a coincidence that the one genre that has really made strides this decade is superhero movies. While every other genre has seemed to decline towards its base level, superhero films have expanded and become more than just capes and crime fighters. The characters are becoming fleshed out, the struggles are both saving the world and internal; things aren't just good and evil anymore.

While I hope that The Dark Knight could inspire more thoughtful storylines (although it would be nice to do so without so many monologues), odds are that Hollywood's response will be "Ooh, people want darker movies".

Review: The Beast

A&E's new show "The Beast" features some intense acting from Patrick Swayze who basically comes off as Tommy Lee Jones playing Vik Mackey from "The Shield". And, like "The Shield" the show is about a rogue law enforcement agent who works by his own code and may or may not be dirty.

However, that's where the comparisons to the well-crafted "The Shield" end.

"The Beast" is a borderline parody. I almost feel like the original pitch was: Imagine if the FBI was run with the same level of logic or security as a podunk police department in Scranton. Nevermind that Swayze's character actually fires a rocket launcher and blows up a car in the middle of a city like it's no big deal but the FBI's evidence room is your stereotypical chain link fence and one old geezer working the window. The "Holy Grail" of FBI evidence (a drive with every FBI undercover agent's in the world's true identity) sits on the shelf closest to the front of the room for everyone to see. To get something out, you just need a single print out. Not one but two people essentially break in and get what the need during the show. It's like someone familiar with the FBI from the 1950's wrote the script and then a young kid just threw in a few new reference like computers and launch cards to make it seem like a present day script.

And while the drive with undercover agents' true identities is a highly sought after object, the actual characters in this show don't seem all that careful about keeping their own identities under wraps. Undercover Feds apparently work in the same city all the time (the same city in which they live), sometimes with what seems like just a week between jobs. They wander in and out of the FBI building without seeming to care that, you know, they are supposedly in the middle of an undercover sting operation. Swayze actually runs out of the building to his car in broad daylight with the box holding the rocket launcher as if he just picking up a pizza. His young partner (played unconvincingly by model Travis Fimmel) is literally starting to date a girl (using his real identity) minutes after working as an undercover.

But perhaps the best part was the ad for The Beast that appeared during the show. One of the quote was "Patrick Swayze elevates" from the Hollywood Reporter. Now I really don't think it takes even a 12 year old to realize that that is only a sentence fragment and that the rest of the sentence was probably cut off for a reason. The full quote was: "Patrick Swayze's work elevates an otherwise ordinary hour" which isn't exactly the kind of blurb you're going to hang your hat on.

Maybe some people will be able to enjoy the show as "Shield-lite", a brain-dead guilty pleasure. If that's what you're looking for though I'd recommend watching Leverage instead as that mediocre show doesn't pretend to be anything more than it is and has its tongue firmly place in cheek. Better yet, watch "Burn Notice" on USA (or Netflix the first season). That show also requires some leaps of faith but it's tone (more A-Team than The Shield) and the cases (more personal, helping the little guy odd jobs than government assignments) make it easy to suspend your disbelief.

"The Beast" takes itself too seriously to be a guilty please and is too ridiculous to be enjoyed as a gritty thriller. Swayze's presence is going to get me to give it one more chance but I seriously doubt that it will still be on the DVR To Do list at this time next week.

January 18, 2009

Remake Eligible

So my friend Will convinced me that there is basically an unwritten rule that films need to be out 20 years for them to be eligible to be remade. It makes sense. I couldn't find an American film from the 90's that's been remade (although I have to think there's at least one). Movies from the 1990 won't be able to be remade until next year.

But that got me thinking, what films from 1989 have just become for Hall of Remake eligible? Which ones could get the remake treatment? Here's the Top 15. (And I will not even SUGGEST that they should even THINK about remaking Field of Dreams.)

1. War of the Roses: Is the current economic climate really right for a film about rich people fighting over their possessions in a bitter divorce? Perhaps it could add a "Hey, even wealthy people are miserable." or "Be Careful What You Wish For?" angle to make it more palatable. An interesting cast could be Denzel Washington (who is looking to do a comedy) and Vivica A. Fox. Josh Brolin and Cate Blanchett? Hollywood would probably go for Ben Affleck and Nicole Kidman and the movie would flop.

2. The Wizard: With video games growing in popularity, I have no idea how this film hasn't been remade or ripped off yet. A studio would probably sell-out, go for the brand trade-out and call it The Wii-zard but whatever, something looking like this film has got to be in the pipeline in some studio.

3. Parenthood: Parenthood is an example of a good movie that SHOULD be ripped off. Many of the issues of raising kids are timeless but the specific issues change. Watching parents deal with raising kids in the era of the internet and cellphone should open up a remake or rip-off of this film to a ton of new opportunities. If Kevin James wanted to raise the level of sophistication of his comedies, this could be a good choice. Hollywood's first choice would probably be Ben Stiller.

4. When Harry Met Sally: They seem to be touching on the Can Men and Women Just Be Friends? angle in "He's Just Not That Into You." And like Parenthood, this storyline could be opened up a bit because of the new era of dating and friendship. Part of me would like to see Chiwetel Ejiofor and Taraji P. Henson get a shot at this but maybe this is a chance to reunite "Accepted" co-stars Blake Lively and Justin Long. Or maybe bring Jason Bateman and Charlize Theron together again. The moguls would likely see this as a chance to reteam Cameron Diaz and Ashton Kutcher or something like Drew Barrymore and Seth Rogen.

5. Turner and Hooch: Dogs are big now. The cast for this could be anyone from Gerard Butler to Martin Lawrence to Jason Segal to Tilda Swinton. I'm thinking Hollywood goes with either Shia LeBeof or this is the film where they finally give Common his chance to be a leading man.

6. The Abyss: I can't really remember this film well enough to make suggestions but it sure seems like something they'd hand Roland Emmerich or Brett Ratner. Ditto for Leviaton.

7. Black Rain: The original film was set in Japan but it would make sense to move it to the ever strengthening China. Josh Brolin as the American cop in over his head. The Mark Strong, the Y2K Andy Garcia, could take Garcia's role and get his head chopped off.

8. K-9: Did I mention dogs were hot right now? If Kevin James doesn't want to get more sophisticated, this would be his film. Honestly, I could see most of the Happy Madison crew from Sandler to Schnieder taking this one. And while they deserve better, this might be the kind of film that Craig Robinson or JB Smoove would have to take to get a shot at being a leading man.

9. Her Alibi: Even with modern CGI you can't match Tom Selleck's moustache but perhaps James Marsden or Greg Kinnear could fill his shoes while Olga Kurylenko takes over Paulina Porizkova's role.

10. The January Man: My guess is Ryan Reynolds would get this role but part of me wouldn't mind Mark Wahlberg slipping back into comedy and getting back to where he was in films like "I Heart Huckabees" and "The Big Hit".

11. Dream A Little Dream: Not up on my tween stars so I can't say who would replace the Corey's but maybe we change the genders and go with Miley Cyrus and Vanessa Hudgens?

12. UHF: My guess is Friedberg and Seltzer would get a hold of this and make it terrible but it's the kind of film that a lot of the sketch comedy guys like Patton Oswalt, Seth Green, and friends might be able to make work.

13. Kickboxer: starring Jason Statham. Seems obvious.

14. Three Fugitives: Well Abigail Breslin plays the girl and maybe she reteams with her Little Miss Sunshine pops, Greg Kinnear, who could slip into the Martin Short role? How do you cast someone to replace Nolte? I'd have to go with Val Kilmer.

15. Casualties of War: Move this war crimes movie into the Iraq conflict and you have a sure-fire bomb no matter who is cast. Well, besides Will Smith. Still, that hasn't stopped Hollywood from trying to make Iraq War movies.

 

January 16, 2009

I Love Which, Man?

Paul Rudd and Jason Segal are teaming up for with the writer/director of Along Came Polly to deliver another romantic comedy. Or rather a buddy comedy which kind of treats finding a friends like it's similar to dating? Anyway, the premise is that Paul Rudd is getting married, has no male friends, and has to find a best man for his wedding. A very strange idea especially since the character of Rudd's brother (the obvious choice of best man) is helping lead the best man search.

Before I go further. Here are the trailers.


Overlooking the odd premise, this movie also seems to be falling deeper into the sinkhole that is the red band/Cursing is Comedy phenomenon. If you watch the two trailers below, you'll notice that they are almost identical. One has swears removed, the other has more swears, more shots of dogs pooping, and only one actually new element (the oral sex issue). In some cases, the red band trailer extends scenes to include swears which seems to play into the recent comedic fad of taking a questionably funny joke and cursing a lot in it to make it funny.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of low brow humor (the script I'm working on now is filled with it) and think that a well-placed swear can make a world of difference (the only good part of Wanted was hearing Morgan Freeman say, "Somebody shoot this MOTHER FUCKER!"). But even I think that it's starting to get a bit out of hand.

The bigger issue, though, is that the trailers have different versions of scenes. The common logic behind red band trailers is that they include scenes that were too raunchy to put in the all audiences trailer. But this film has the exact same scenes, just raunchier versions.  The opening of the first trailer has the Edited for TV version with Rashida Jones's friends saying "sex" and "lock that stud down". The red band has the raunchier version with "fucked" and "lock that tongue down" (a cunnilngus reference, if you haven't watched the trailers) The question, of course, is which version am I going to see? Did they alter the movie to be able to get an All Audience Preview or did they add some stuff in order to get the raunchier Red Band?

One of these trailers is selling a movie that is different from the one people are expecting. I'd have to guess that it's the first trailer which means a lot of people could be waltzing into a friendly little comedy and getting inundated with gross-out, if-I-curse-it's-funny humor. I know that a lot of this isn't really new but as I said before, it's starting to get out of hand. Or as I'd say in my red band version, this goddamn shit's getting out of mother fucking hand. 

LINK: The Weekend's Assignment

Just stumbled upon a website called COWRITE which is a screenplay contest by production/management company Benderspink. The gist of the contest is that they are going to build a screenplay by committee. The first round is the first ten pages of a script based on the given premise. Every other week, contestants will write the next ten pages based on the previous winner's 10 pages.

The premise of the script is: Determined to be a high-level Jason Bourne type operative, an awkward teenager enlists the help of a mysterious, supposed ex-CIA agent in his hometown and finds himself entangled in a dangerous plot that is way over his head.

The producers have also said that they are looking for a Pineapple Express meets Napolean Dynamite feel to the film so also have to work within those parameters and can't make a Bourne spoof movie. 

The contest appeals to me for three reasons: it's only ten pages so shouldn't take THAT long, the winners are announced every week so it's instant gratification as opposed to most contests which take months to announce even the quarter-finalists, and I'm unemployed so $3000 bucks would be a nice boost to the ol' savings balance. (Also, entries only cost 10 bucks so it's pretty cheap). Also, the winner gets a meeting with Benderspink so it's a shot at getting my foot in the door.

And did I mention it only costs 10 bucks (14 if I'm so lazy that I can't get the 10 pages done until the late deadline of the 21st). 

Should be interesting.


January 15, 2009

And the next Danny McBride is...

Hollywood loves a good bandwagon. Mickey Rourke couldn't get cast for a decade and now he's getting cast in "Iron Man 2" and a handful of other films. Similarly, if someone breaks out, it seems like everyone wants to catch the rising star. Danny McBride went from a role in a small indie film to seemingly popping up in every other comedy that came out (Paul Rudd got the other half). And it now looks like we have a new rising star.

Aubrey Plaza is the name and she's spun her Apatow approval (she's cast in Apatow's next directorial venture "Funny People") into a role on Amy Poehler's upcoming show and now a spot in the new film from Edgar Wright (Spaced, Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz). This Upright Citizen's Brigade alum seems to have made the leap from her supporting roles on web-series (she played Jeannie Tate's daughter {see below} and had a role on ESPN's Mayne Street) to the big screen.

Will she make it to Steve Carrell leading man status or settle into the background ala David Koechner? Only time will tell.

 

January 14, 2009

Cast this remake!: "Rudo y Cursi"

The Sundance Film Festival has already seen it's first sale. The movie is called "Rudo y Cursi" and stars Diego Luna and Gael Garcia Bernal as brothers who have risen from humble beginnings to become superstar soccer players. Unfortunately, their stardom turns the two brothers into bitter rivals.

Sounds like something that John C. Reilly and Will Ferrell would love to star in, especially if you turned futbol into American football. I could see the avid USC football fan jumping at the opportunity to get his shot at a football movie. That being said, Reilly and Ferrell are a little old for the role so maybe it's time to look elsewhere. The Wilson brothers could fit in, maybe have Wes Anderson do the remake, but I'd still rather try to stick with younger or up-and-coming actors. So what could some other options be? Here are a few ideas:

Craig Robinson and Idris Elba: Would love to see Robinson get his shot at a leading role and I think Elba could be a perfect counterpart in a football movie.

Danny McBride and Bradley Cooper: This also could be Cooper's shot at a leading role. He's been relegated to jerk status (Wedding Crashers) or best friend roles (Failure to Launch, Yes Man) so far so maybe this is his chance. This might be better suited as a baseball movie but boxing, tennis, or even MMA could work.

James Franco and James Marsden: Franco refound his footing with "Pineapple Express" and might want to stick with comedy for a bit. I also think Marsden is highly underrated as a comedic actor and could be a nice complement to Franco.

Ben Foster and Emile Hirsch: Not sure if either can do comedy but they are great actors and I'd pay to see them battle it out.

Leighton Meester and Olivia Thirlby: Replacing Meester with Ellen Page and bringing the Juno girls back together might be a better marketing strategy but I think Meester and Thirlby are a nice contrasts of styles. If you're going for total prissiness (and want the girls to look alike) maybe team Meester with Minka Kelly.

Sarah Shahi and Frieda Pinto: If just to look at them and encourage them to team up for a Maxim photoshoot.

I'm sure there are tons of better options out there. Any ideas?

Alternate Ending to "Pineapple Express"

Not sure if this is real or just the Apatow gang screwing around but this is purported to be the alternate ending to "Pineapple Express". I'm glad it wasn't because the Morning After breakfast was one of the funnier parts of the movie.

The Sequel Shuffle

There's a natural order to sequels. Not all films follow this route but this is how I'd say most film series end up playing out.

Film #1: The film is a smash success and leave people wanting more. And "people" could mean the audience or a cult following or a studio head who is in desperate need of a hit and thinks that remaking a film is a sure thing.

Film #2: A carbon copy of the first. The latest example is probably "National Treasure: Book of Secrets" which was basically the exact same movie as National Treasure. Sometimes, in cases like X2 or The Godfather, the sequel could actually build upon the first movie but more often than not, the movie is a watered down version of the first film.

Film #3: This film is usually terrible. Whether it's because the story line was spead too thin or too many people are now involved with the production or because the stars refused to do it or because everyone was just in it for the paycheck, third films almost always struggle. Usually, this is where most film series end.

Note: In some cases, films 2 and 3 are reversed, the second one sucks so they make a third one, which to ensure quality, is basically a rehash of the first movie (see: Ocean's 11)

But some are lucky to get to a fourth movie. And when you get to a fourth movie, all hell breaks loose. Fourth movies are usually the height of silliness. Often it can work (Live Free or Die Hard, Rocky IV) but other times it fails miserably (Superman IV, Alien: Resurrection). For Fast and Furious, I have a feeling that its going to work out and give us a movie that would be the thrill ride of the summer if you weren't laughing so hard at it.

January 13, 2009

RIP XOXO

I was hoping for a New Year revival for my guilty pleasure Gossip Girl but it seems like it's past the point of no return. In fact, it's getting to the point where people might actually start hurting their careers if they stay on much longer. Chase Crawford really has no point at all anymore. His character just floats around, making random cameos. I'm a fan of Taylor Momsen but she went from young adult trying to prove herself to bratty little child in no time flat. More and more she's getting labeled as the most annoying (if not worst) thing on the show and that's not something you want the fans of your cult show pegging you with.

Leighton Meester needs to stretch a bit. She's amazing at playing the poor little rich girl but she needs to do what all young actresses need to: play a normal person. Blake Lively has done it a bit with Accepted and Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants. (And no, playing the virginal yet slutty pop princess on Entourage isn't going to help Miss Meester either).

I don't even know what to say about Chuck Bass. His character has become a caricature of a caricature. At least, Kelly Rutherford has been looking amazing and my man Matthew Settle (aka Spears from Band of Brothes) is still holding his own. I'm really surprised he hasn't been able to nab a superhero role of any sort.

Anyway, the fall from grace has been Heroes level (which got erased from the season pass) but it's getting close. This week was painful to get through and I wasn't even paying attention to it half of the time. The whole finish to the adoption story was hilarious. We wait weeks for the answer and it's that the kid died. And they don't even give them a photo; just a cut-out of the obituary? Really? They then pour salt on the wound by tossing in the ace in the hole plot twist of the kid not really being dead (you know, so they can bring him in when the storylines get even more depleted).

Oh, and how did Chuck not see the brunch coming? There's a party every week in their circle of friends. At that point, shouldn't he have stopped and thought, "Shit, there hasn't been a reason for our rag tag group to all be in the same place at one time recently. I better make sure there's not a surprise brunch going on anytime soon."

And to make matters worse, word is that last year's ensharktress Georgina is making a comeback.  

Oh well, it was fun while it lasted. I'd be stunned if this show made it past a third season.

 

January 12, 2009

Review: Spaced

Well, I'm only a decade late to the party but I've watched the first season of "Spaced" (which is only 7 episodes) and have to say I'm a fan. The sit-con which was pitched as a cross between "The Simpsons, X-Files, and Northern Exposure" features Simon Pegg and was directed by Edgar Wright. If you're a fan of "Shaun of the Dead" and "Hot Fuzz" you should definitely check this show out.

The stories are thin but filled with genre parodies and pop culture references which make the show entertaining. It also takes a couple of episodes to really get going but I recommend checking it out on Nextflix or anywhere else the DVD is available.  The first episode is on YouTube. Embedding has been disable so you'll have to click here to see it.

January 08, 2009

Review: Valkyrie

After the debacle that was Superman Returns, Bryan Singer's career had to places to go: Up Up or Away. Thankfully, Valkyrie is a solid step in the right direction. The film is well made, features strong acting, and I've always been a fan of the way that Singer and Newton Thomas Sigel capture the images of their films. Some people are thrown by Tom Cruise's lack of accent in the film but it didn't get to me and I liked the fact that they at least tried to acknowledge it.

On the downside, the film is fairly straightforward yet still relies heavily on "What's going to happen?!" suspense. The problem with this is that everyone already knows what is going to happen. It would have been tough to pull off but the film might have been better had it been crafted more as a Whodunnit. Maybe start with the plan failing and people trying to figure out what went wrong, then go through the plot and we watch, trying to figure out who is going to be the culprit who ruins the plot to assassinate Hitler.

Even still, it's an entertaining film, a solid B. There's no need to rush out and see it or put it at the top of your Netflix queue but it's the kind of film that could be a pleasant surprise if you decide to check it out some time. This film won't be Tom Cruise back on top but it at least helps salvage what's left of his image. Personally, I think he needs to get into another thriller and not focus so much on comedy (his next film "Men" is directed by Old School's Todd Phillips) but maybe he feels that he needs to soften his image and make himself more likeable before he tries to regain his standing as one of Hollywood's most bankable movie stars.

January 06, 2009

Radiohead meets Jay-Z

If you liked the White Album-Hova matchup, someone named Minty Fresh decided to do the same thing with Radiohead's music. I've only heard a couple of songs on the Jaydiohead mix but so far it's pretty good. No surprise, the best songs are the redoes of 99 Problems and Dirt off your Shoulders. (Dreaming Up and Change Order are also great). The Karma Police mashup doesn't really work but overall it's still a great listen. Should be interesting to see if this guy breaks out ala the man who went from mash-up to Gnarls Barkley. Vulture had the best line about it: "We don't know if Minty is the next Danger Mouse — maybe he can convince André 3000 to start a band with him called Extreme Abdul Jabar"

Jaydiohead :: Jay-Z x Radiohead

The Tryout: Do You Believe in Gosh?

Mitch Hedberg was one of my favorite comedians and I was very happy to see him get the Tupac treatment with a posthumous release. The set released on this CD isn't his best work, it's a bit ragged at time with a few jokes that even Hedberg realizes don't work but, as always, he can spin his biggest flops into laughs. It's a great listen and had me laughing out loud a few times. While it might not be the best Mitch Hedberg routine, it's still better than most stand-up that's out there.

(To listen, go to The Tryout over in the right column)

Review: A Curious Case, Indeed

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button is getting heaps of praise but I have to admit, the movie really fell flat for me. The biggest issue with Benjamin Button is that I had no idea who Benjamin Button was. Yes, he was a guy who aged backwards but other than that, who was he? He kind of seemed like a bum, shifting around from one dead end job to another, in spite of his gift/curse. Why am interested in a movie about a guy who can age backwards if his aging backwards doesn't really ever seem to matter all that much?

He worked on a tugboat as a young but old-looking man. And? I'm sure he wasn't the only teenager to take to the seas in that era. He had an affair with an older woman who taught him things about the world. Great but the fact that he wasn't really as old as he seemed didn't really matter. In fact, he just looked like a sheltered or naive old man. Besides the ending of the flimsy love story (which hinged almost completely on the belief that Cate and Brad were meant to be in spite of, well, everything), the film would have been virtually the same if Button was a regular kid growing up.

Don't get me wrong, Benjamin Button was beautifully shot and a well-made film but it was hardly an intriguing story, the characters relationships were paper thin, and I really can't believe that it's one of the best movies of the year. I honestly could buy Synechdoche, NY as a Best Picture nominee before Ben Button. At least in that case I could think "Well, maybe I didn't really get it." but I understood Benjamin Button. The only thing that didn't register is why people think it's some sort of classic.

If there's one thing that should stand out from this rather forgettable movie, it's that Taraji P. Henson needs to be considered one of the top young actresses in the biz.  Other than that, I really don't see this movie laying claim to anything more than a footnote in the careers of Fincher and Pitt. In fact, I think both of their movies last year (Zodiac and The Assassination of Jesse James) were better films than Button.

In the end, I think the theme of the movie overtook the story, plot, characters, and premise. And the theme just wasn't all that intriguing. It's not a bad film but I wouldn't recommend it.

January 05, 2009

Honkywood: The Shazam Story

I have to say, I wasn't really all that interested in the proposed film version of Shazam. I don't think I actually  saw the cartoon or ever read the comic. That being said, John August's account of what happened with the film and how it went from a comedic movie starring a kid to (proposed) edgier, older fare and then fell from greenlight heaven to development hell is interesting. The key components, it seems, had nothing to do with the script itself but rather centered around the box office.

In retrospect, I can point to two summer Warner Bros. movies that I believe defined the real issue at hand: Speed Racer and The Dark Knight. The first flopped; the second triumphed. Given only those two examples, one can understand why a studio might wish for their movies to be more like the latter. But to do so ignores the success of Iron Man, which spent most of its running time as a comedic origin story, and the even more pertinent example of WB’s own Harry Potter series. I tried to make this case, to no avail.

You can find the full story at John August's blog but it's very interesting to see how a veteran screenwriter like August (who penned Go! and Big Fish, among others) can be felled by the foibles of the front office. It shows how people can be confident in an idea until an even barely comparable film struggles. This is the industry I'm trying to work in.

Why I Like Message Boards: Reason #1

People often wonder why I waste time on message boards but the fact of the matter is that it is the only place where I get to really discuss things that I'm interested. It's a place where people can go and rant about the intricacies of basketball, the many ways Tony Allen is terrible, the problems with The Dark Knight, wonder aloud if there was a worse film than Max Payne last year, etc. Usually bringing these things up in conversation will get you nothing more than an eye roll so it's always nice to find some place where you can discuss things that most people don't care about. Not only does it let you discuss your interests but it also is open for creativity.

One of the best posts of the last year on my main message board @ okayplayer.com was from a guy who goes by the name Stylez Dainty. The post was called: My ideas for indie movies that have never been done before. The post was a list of cliche-breaking ideas like 

-In a prank gone wrong, a group of friends accidentally kill someone. They immediately confess to the authorities.

-A college professor is a good husband and father with a happy home life.

-A group of lovable losers decide not to commit a crime.

-A road trip goes according to plan.

This post inspired many others on the board to chine in with their own ideas. One of mine was "A white teacher an inner city school is just in it for the paycheck."

It's not groundbreaking but it's a good way to get the brain working whether you're at home bored or falling asleep at work. While most message board posts are discussions over films, sports, what have you, the creative ones often pop up to spice things up. The OKSports board has a post that pops up every so often called "The Shortest Books in the World". It's a clever way to complain about things. Some of the shortest books have been: "Clock Management" by Andy Reid, "Run Blocking" by Steve Smith (foreword by Randy Moss), or "Clutch" by Alex Rodriguez.

Does this make me any less of a loser for wasting time on these boards? No. Should I still cut down the time I waste on them? Definitely. But the knee-jerk dismissal of the boards is misguided. Long live the message board! 

In Defense of Heigl

As a confessed fan of romantic-comedies, I have to say that there are few actresses that I am interested in seeing in a rom-com as much as Katherine Heigl. I think she has great comic timing and, of course, is easy on the eyes. I'm also a fan of Rock'n'rolla style Gerard Butler, he could fill the slot vacated by Mel Gibson, so the trailer for "The Ugly Truth" is one of my favorite previews out there right now.

Unfortunately, it seems like Katherine Heigl has hurt her reputation with many (or, at least, many on the internet) because she speaks her mind. Is that really a bad thing? While I know a lot of people bow to the throne of Apatow, let's be honest, most of his films are male coming-of-age fantasies and not really rom-coms. When Heigl said she was somewhat displeased with the portrayal of women in "Knocked Up" (saying the film "paints the women as shrews, as humorless and uptight, and it paints the men as goofy, fun-loving guys... It was hard for me to love the movie.") was she really wrong? Seth Rogen is a hero in the movie for doing the bare minimum. The guy gets a job and reads a baby book and suddenly he's the hero. The movie was fun and all but let's not go crazy and start acting like what she said wasn't true.

Heigl also wasn't fond of where her Grey's character was going, which was something that a number of fans were saying (and even more fans jumped off of the bandwagon this year and I haven't heard her going public over how she feels about her ghostly love affair). Also, not to go all Tina Fey on the issue, but when men sound off about their roles, most people overlook it. Wentworth Miller recently questioned his character in "Prison Break" and I believe it was William Peterson who once said his role on C.S.I. wasn't acting, it was just reciting.

People also need to get over it because Heigl has the kind of look that makes for a star. She's pretty but not the belle of the ball. You can believe that James Marsden would hit on her but you could also believe that Ed Burns could overlook her and fall for her younger sister instead. "Marley and Me" winning the box office for two straight weeks means that Jennifer Aniston won't lose her crown of top box office star that most guys don't think should really be a box office star but Katherine Heigl is running a close second. Or third if you count Sarah Jessica Parker. That might seem like a diss to Katherine Heigl but it's actually a compliment and one that I don't think she would be ashamed to take. 

As for the movie, it's written by Karen McCullah Lutz, who also wrote "10 Things I Hate About You" and "Legally Blonde". Granted, she seems to be repeating herself of late, revisiting Blonde with "The House Bunny" and the make-a-bet-that-you-can't-get-someone-to-fall-in-love storyline is a wee bit similar to "The Taming of the Shrew" (although it has an interesting twist in this case). Also it features Cheryl Hines and NewRadio's Vicki Lewis as well as soon-to-be That Girl Bree Turner (a girl who's pretty enough to notice but not stunning enough to remember). What's not to... really like? Well, besides it being a romantic-comedy which most people don't (or won't own up to) liking.

Some might wonder how "The Ugly Truth" is any different but this seems to be a film that addresses the very problems Heigl brought up with "Knocked Up". There's a line (and in films, it's often a fine line) between being shrewish and being "normal" or professional. The film seems to focus more on guys, asking Do guys just want a woman who will be the object of their affection or do they really appreciate the finer things?  It's an interesting take on the makeover movie. In many movies, especially the Apatow comedies, the question is whether the guy can become a functioning human being in time to melt his damsel in distress's heart. I don't begrudge Katherine Heigl her fame nor her opinion. In fact, I hope to see and hear more from her in the future.

January 04, 2009

The Lineup: January

January is a dumping ground for most studios so it isn't a surprise that there aren't many good new movies arriving at the local theaters. Because of this, most of my time will likely be spent catching up on Oscar-bait that I didn't see in 2008. As of now, "Gran Torino" and "Valkyrie" have been relegated to Netflix status while I'm on the fence when it comes to "The Wrestler". The film looks interesting enough but I've already seen the documentary "Beyond the Mat" and the main character in Darren Aronofsky's film seems like it is based heavily on Jake "The Snake" Roberts. While I don't doubt that Mickey Rourke is compelling in The Wrestler, I doubt it can match the feeling of watching a guy you watched when you were growing up struggle with his demons, try to reconnect with his daughter, and ultimately fall back into the world of addiction. "Beyond the Mat" is a must-see for anyone who grew up watching the old WWF and I think it would probably be an interesting watch for even those people who barely know wrestling exists. The mixed reviews for "Revolutionary Road" and "Doubt" haven't helped them but I think I'll probably see them both in the theaters. 

As for the new releases, there really isn't much there. "Bride Wars" reeks of rental. Anne Hathaway is getting Oscar buzz for "Rachel Getting Married" but let's hope for her sake that this pairing with Kate Hudson isn't indicative of her future. Maybe it's the tabloid stuff but there's something about Hathaway that is rather irksome; I really can't see her fulfilling what was once through to be her destiny of becoming the next Julia Roberts. 

"Notorious" is a non-starter for me. I'm just not sure what exactly Biggie did that was so revolutionary that he needs his own movie. "Paul Blart: Mall Cop" seems like something I'd have no problem ignoring, I rarely see horror films in the theater and none of the January films interest me (or even seem all that different), and I think I can further delay seeing the much-delayed films like "Possession", "Outlander", and "Killshot". Being a rom-com nerd, I could actually see myself going to "New in Town" but Renee Zelwegger is just too hard to watch. She's used to be adorable but now she comes off as a mousy version of Jennifer Tilly (but with worse luck with botox). That being said, it would be nice to see Jennifer Tilly make a little comeback.

The one movie that, if it gets good reviews, could get me to the the movies is "Taken". It doesn't look like much but it could be the kind of low-watt actioner that is a decent diversion one afternoon. 

January 03, 2009

The Definitive Movies of 2008

2008 wasn't a good year for film. Personally, I don't think there were any "great" films this year and there were only a handful of very good flicks. So what movies best defined the year that was?

The Happening: M. Night Shymalan's ode to b-movies was one of the worst movies of the year and part of me thinks that is exactly what he was going for. The performances were so bad that I had to believe that Night told people to act poorly. People can harp on Shymalan for this but he's hardly alone. More and more we are seeing people embrace the b-movie and actually aim for camp value over quality. Back in the day, filmmakers complained that the studios watered down their films. Now, the big name directors seem to be watering down their films themselves.

If you want to blame the studios for anything, look at the marketing. The selling point for The Happening was that it was the first R-rated feature from M. Night. Really? Did they think that was what America was waiting for? A raunchier Shymalan? Actually, the answer might be yes. More and more, we see films getting lauded for pushing the envelope in terms of violence or gratuitous blood. People are now sated by a few quality action scenes. They'll gladly overlook story issues, and some times convince themselves that things made sense, while being content if the movie had a few quality action scenes.

 

Death Race: Some people said this movie was a comment on society and reality TV but the real commentary was that this supposed indictment of modern TV is a remake of a film that was made before the dawn of reality TV. Like many films this year, Death Race might have been trying to say something but it wasn't saying anything new. Even Oscar-bait like Milk, W., and Frost/Nixon pulled their punches and gave us the stories we knew rather than trying to make a new statement. I still believe that a film about Harvey Milk's killer, Dan White, would have been more interesting than a rehash of the Milk story which was covered better in "The Times of Harvey Milk", the Oscar winning doc made in 1985. Although, if there was a film that pulled punches, it was...

The Dark Knight: I thought the close-up of the rat at the end of The Departed was nail on the head but that was downright subtle when compared to the tell, don't show approach of The Dark Knight. A lot of people loved the film and overlooked the script issues but this was a film that said nothing but had so many long-winded monologues that people could take whatever they wanted to out of it. The movie was explicitly vague. Some fans of The Dark Knight came unglued when a writer claimed that the film was actually a defense of George W. Bush but you could easily see the film like that. While many films in the future could take a darker approach because of this film, I think just as many will follow the lead and allude to current events while never actually taking a stand on any issues yet people will still act like it was somehow profound.

Hancock: Besides being a superhero movie, this is a film that featured style over substance. The movie had little to no story, was horribly structured, but made over 200 million. And you know what, I was entertained by it. I can't say for a number of other questionable fare like Wanted, Cloverfield, Eagle Eye, 10,000 BC, etc. but more and more, scripts are being eschewed while FX are taking the priority. This isn't exactly a new development but the studios are growing more brazen and making more and more films that are about as well written as "The Hills". One of the reasons this is a going trend is the growing money in overseas box office. A film like 10,000 BC might be stupid but it still translates into 174 million overseas. Special effects don't require subtitles.

Sex and the City: Be it Carrie Bradshaw, or Twlight, or High School Musical 3, the going recipe seems to be that films aimed towards the female audience require some sort of pre-fabricated package. While studios seem happy to throw out any piece of male-oriented crap like Eagle Eye, they don't seem confident in the ladies unless the property has shown popularity in the past.  "The Women" didn't exactly help things either, bombing after Nikki Finke's campaign for a wide release and being labeled by some critics as one of the worst movies of 2008.

January 02, 2009

SoulMix: Ode to Notes


Another year, another batch of SoulMixes. This year I thought I'd spice it up a bit and try to give each mix a theme. The first mix is a shortened version of a mix I made a while back called Ode to Notes. It's a mix tape that goes through what reality tv editors and story producers feel like when they have to get notes on their episode from EP's and network execs. Here's the breakdown.

"Road to Nowhere" by Talking Heads: First off, I have to say that this mix is based on those bad situations when you're dealing with an exec producer or someone at the network who doesn't know what they are doing. More often than not, notes help make the show better. Unfortunately, there are the cases when the execs are just out of it and their notes are random, if not completely silly. Some execs feel like they need to give notes for the sake of giving notes and end up offering changes that don't make the show better, just a little different. Because of this, heading into some notes meetings can feel like you're on a road to nowhere and in the end you end up repeating, "It's all right" to yourself.

"We Can Work It Out" by Paul McCartney: While most people would publically say that this is the song that best describes their attitude when awaiting notes or sitting down in the meeting, the truth is that in the back of their head, the song that they are hearing is "Better Way" by Ben Harper.

"Authority Song" by John Mellencamp: One of the many mantras I've picked up while working in reality television is "It's their show". You can give every logical reason behind one of your decisions but if the execs don't like it, you aren't going to win the argument. On the extended mix, this point was also represented by "I Fought The Law" by The Clash.

"The Pieces Don't Fit Anymore" by James Morrison: While most reality shows aren't all that elaborate, they are a bit like a house of cards. If you change one thing, many times it affects five other things. If you cut out a couple shots, the editor then has to change the music underneath it so it fits or has to find somewhere else to extend so the show fills the running time. The joke about editors is: How many editors does it take to change a lightbulb? One, but if you change the lightbulb, you have to change EVERYTHING.  

"Rape Me" by Nirvana: I think this is self-explanatory.

"Get Me Outta Here" by Jet: Usually the thought going through everyone's mind at the end of a meeting.

"Everything is Average Nowadays" by Kaiser Chiefs: Heading back to their office or edit bay, many story producers and editors bemoan their clever tricks and interesting subplots that were excised and whine that the show is now just another reality show. People often start wondering why they are still stuck in reality and why they aren't doing something else with their lives. This feeling quickly passes because they realize that making reality TV is better than getting a real job and, to be honest, the show that they originally handed in wasn't Shakespeare. People often say that their shows "could have been something" but that something would just have been another reality show.

"The Slow Descent into Alcoholism" by The New Pornographers: If watching reality TV cast members doesn't kill your brain cells, there's nothing like some booze to finish the job. This songs also somewhat fitting because I'm sure some people would argue that, in a way, reality TV is the new pornography. I haven't seen gay porn but I can't imagine that it's much different than "Bromance". On the extended mix, the drinking continues with "Alcohol" by Barenaked Ladies and "Polar Opposites" by Modest Mouse.

"Comfortably Numb" by Pink Floyd: People in reality TV have an amazing ability to exhibit passionate apathy. They will hem and haw about having to make changes, some people get visibly upset, others change their facebook status, but they usually defuse themselves by saying "Whatever. I don't care. It's not a big deal." They then make the requested changes and go back to IMing their friends or trying to make fantasy football trades.

"No Need to Argue" by The Cranberries: Everything is calm. It's over and done. You've learned from your mistakes and promise not to get worked up about notes. But you will. As you head to the next notes meeting you'll be humming "Road to Nowhere" and expecting the worst.

January 01, 2009

Adsense

I've decided to try to ads to the site to see if I can't make some scratch off of all of my ramblings. So please feel free to click the ad to the right and check out whatever google thinks they should advertise on this site. Apparently they've taken the soulhonky name and decided to advertise soul, R&B, and funk. I guess I should have seen that coming.

The rejiggering of the site is about done. Not sure how thrilled I am with the new look but there's not really much I can do with my limited HTML/web design skills. Hope people like the site. Happy New Year.


Hosting by Yahoo!

Film-Rank-0426.jpg
022109.jpg