« August 2008 | Main | October 2008 »

September 29, 2008

Politicked Off: The Audacity of Clinton's Place Called Hope

In his inauguration speech, Bill Clinton said that he still believed in a place called hope. Judging from his recent interviews, it's fairly obvious that he's still still believing. And that's unfortunate because I've been living in that hope place and I can tell you that it's miserable. For instance, I hope I can lose weight. The reason I hope that is because I actually tried working out and hated it so now I'm just hoping something happens. Similarly, I tried eating healthier but now I'm hoping the Papa John's guy will get here because I'm fucking starving.

For Clinton, his place called hope doesn't seem to different than mine. His wife tried to become President and now he's hoping she can get another shot at the Dem nomination in four years.

September 26, 2008

Politicked Off: McCain Wins By Not Losing

This debate was like the late round of a prize fight in which one of the boxers was woozy at the previous bell and people expect a knockout punch from the opponent. The woozy boxer, however, bounces off of his stool, lands a few punches while taking a few shots, and survives the round. Suddenly, he seems like he's back in it even though all he did was not get knocked to the canvas. This was John McCain's night. After a week and a half of serious missteps by his campaign, McCain came out, handled himself well enough, and lived to fight another day. 

For Obama, people seemed to expect a knockout punch even though this was a fight he just couldn't win. After Barrack handled himself well in the debate, Sean Hannity complained that Obama gave "book answers" and didn't really have any experience backing it up. Of course it seems that way. The fact of the matter is that Obama really doesn't have any experience backing it up. People knew that before the debate even started. Unless he stepped on stage and said he was FDR reincarnated, there was no way he could have done better than book answers. Sure, he might not have experience but he said all of the right things, had the right ideas, and seemed like he could handle the experience. The fact that he walked out of it in a draw was, in the big picture, a victory for his campaign.

In the long run, this night has to keep Democrats happy. Obama survived the debate that featured his achilles heel and seemed Presidential in answering his questions and providing plans for the future. McCain got to Obama on a couple of issues but didn't make any real dent and also didn't seem to give any indication that his plans for the future were much different than the current flawed policies. But because he held his own and didn't get knocked out of the race, it seems like a victory for McCain.

On a related note, the Sarah Palin choice really came back to haunt the Republicans in this one. While Joe Biden was working the news circuit after the debate, hammering home points for his ticket, Sarah Palin was MIA. The New Republic noted that CNN even made note of this fact because people were complaining about the lack of exposure for both parties:

"We've been getting some emails from viewers out there wondering why we spent some time interviewing Joe Biden, the Democratic vice presidential nominee and not Sarah Palin, the Republican vice presidential nominee. We would have loved to interview--we'd still love to interview Sarah Palin. Unfortunately we asked, we didn't get that interview...We're hoping that Sarah Palin will join us at some point down the road."  - Wolf Blitzer

Instead the Republicans had Rudy Giuliani who didn't exactly help matters because after he spoke, Dick Morris opined that Giuliani's answers made it clear that the Republicans nominated the wrong person.

(Oh yeah, and everyone who was clamoring that Obama should have taken Hillary, you need to be quiet because if the Clinton name was on the ticket during this sub-prime mortgage debacle, Obama would be done.)

I think that McCain could get a small bump from tonight but with bigger, tougher rounds ahead, it was a small victory. 

Review: If You Liked "Live Free or Die Hard"...

...then you might find "Eagle Eye" to be mildly enjoyable. The film, like Live Free or Die Hard, requires you to suspend your disbelief and just enjoy the movie for what it is. You also need to realize that it's a poor man's version of the latest Die Hard and isn't in the class of it or a film like "Enemy of the State".

The biggest problem is that there really isn't anything there. The characters are blah, the chase is interesting at times but the editing is haphazard and the direction shaky. There are scenes that are kind of cool but not really exciting as they should be. Watching it, you think that a scene is cool but also immediately realize how much better it could have been. It almost feels like a rough draft of a script and a first pass at a movie. It's the type of film that i think should be on the future remake pile because it's a very interesting concept but they didn't quite pull it off.

That being said, it's still entertaining. There are a couple of lulls but nothing too bad. For Shia and director DJ Caruso, it's a definite step up from Disturbia but they still have a ways to go to craft a truly memorable action film. All in all, it's a solid effort.

September 25, 2008

Politicked Off: Money As Debt

Here's a little (well, not little, it's 47 minutes long) primer on how money works. Actually, it's more about how money doesn't work, at least not in its current form. Thanks to fellow message boarder ArquimedezMojo for posting this. After watching this, I highly recommend Knight Rider to get you back into high spirits.

September 24, 2008

Everyone Must Watch Knight Rider

I really don't know how Knight Rider doesn't get Ben Silverman fired. It's arguably the worst network TV show ever. It's really had to figure out what to compare this show to. It's basically a You Tube video that occasionally rises to the level of USA Up All Night soft core sanitized porn (if the editor was on coke). Honestly, it's not even that good in terms of crappy syndicated shows. If I had to choose between this and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's The Lost World, I honestly don't know which I would choose. My favorite scene might be when Mike and Sarah run into a room to escape gunfire. (At around 6:30 into the show) Sarah risks getting shot to close the door behind them and then locks the door with... one of those simple slide latches. And it apparently works. 2nd place might be when Mike is shooting hoops, throws up a shot that is obviously going to miss and then cut to the ball swishing through the hoop. (Around 38:50) To be fair, there were a couple of decent one liners and most of the girls are sexy.

Thanks to Josh for telling me to check this out. Click on the pic below to watch. 

On a side note, after this and "Death Proof", Sidney Tamiia Poitier should avoid any show or movie that is based around cars.

September 23, 2008

Another One Down

"Heroes" should really be a comedy. When Future Peter was about to shoot his brother (after shooting him earlier but having him miraculously recover), I was really hoping it would be an on-running joke. Peter shoots Natan, Nathan recovers, Nathan finds TV cameras, Peter shoots Nathan again. Repeat this a few times and then end the episode with someone pulling the time-traveling future Peter aside and saying, "Hey, why don't you just leap back to BEFORE the press conference and talk him out of it instead of shooting him?"

Peter: "I didn't... (glare)... think of that." And then he disappears.

Once again, "Heroes" has a great concept and some very interesting ideas but it is drowning in cheesy dialogue, clunky monologues, and a complete lack of logic. I really struggled getting through the hour (and stated using the fast-forward button in the 2nd episode) and when it was all over, I immediately took it off of the DVR To Do List. Part of me still was holding out hope that the show could really reach its potential but I know better. Heroes is what Heroes has always been: A daytime soap with super powers.

On the bright side, Gossip Girl picked up and got back to the basics that made it so much fun to start with: Serena vs. Blair vs. Chuck. The show is utterly ridiculous but I guess the key difference between it and Heroes is that I don't really expect more out of the trashy teen soap whereas Heroes could be so much better than it is.

September 22, 2008

The Wire Appreciation Day

Well, the Emmy's once again failed to honor arguably the best show ever on television so let's take time to appreciate the amazing show that was, The Wire. It's hard to say why the show never caught on with Emmy voters. One problem is that a lot of voters vote based solely on the Emmy screeners they receive. It's hard to watch just one episode of The Wire and truly appreciate it. I also can't help but acknowledge that a show with that was really focused on the urban, inner city experience is probably not going to find a lot of fans with the older, upper class (and, yes, white) Academy members. And finally, there weren't many recognizable faces. I guarantee that one of the reason Bryan Cranston won his Emmy was not only his performance in "Breaking Bad" but also by how much it differed from his role on "Malcolm in the Middle".

In the end, the below clip is one of the reason I loved The Wire, one of the reasons it was one of the best shows ever, and why it probably didn't sit well with most Emmy voters.

September 21, 2008

Happy Hipster Day!

I rarely agree with hipsters. I don't start disliking things once Middle America discovers them, I think moustaches look silly on most people, and I don't embrace crappy movies from the past as forgotten classics. More often than not, I don't get why their beloved bands are so amazing but on Tuesday there are a few "hipster" releases that I can get around. I've already bought TV on the Radio's "Dear Science" and King of Leon's "Only by the Night". Like with "Dear Science", this album probably won't make many new converts but the base should be happy.

TV on the Radio's album might take a few listens to really get into but right now it's in the good not great category. And honestly, I'm not a huge fan so I can't say I'm surprised. This is an album that fans will love but probably won't help the band attract many new fans (as a song like "Wolf Like Me" was able to). It also shouldn't be a surprise that I find the Kings of Leon album better. It's a little more mainstream so of course people will fault them for not being as original as TV on the Radio but personally, I just think they make better music. Kings of Leon still manages to write songs that seem unlikely to get onto the American popular radar but I'm a fan. "Use Somebody" might have a shot but there's not much to it. I kind of wish someone like Alicia Keys or Nelly Furtado could perform a stripped down version with an added lyrical break; it could be a prom night staple for 2009. One thing about the album though is that it doesn't exactly flow from one song to the next. Part of me also misses some of the simple rockers like "Four Kicks" and "Happy Alone" but I'm happy with the purchase of "Only by the Night"

I'm not sure if they're hipster material but The Old Crow Medicine Show has a new album as do definite hipster heroes Cold War Kids. I'm late to the Cold War Kids party and, honestly, I'm not really blown away. They have some good songs but I'm not sure if their last album and the first new song (below) is enough to make their new album a must buy. Like many of their songs, the opening of a Cold War Kids song gets me interested but then it doesn't seem to go anywhere. I like the song but it's one of those songs that I'd gladly listen to on the  radio but one that I'd never really find myself hankering for. If I do buy another album, it would probably be Mogwai, another group that I didn't listen to until recently. So let's all celebrate to some new interesting music getting released. 

September 19, 2008

Where's the Romance?

After reading the glowing reviews for the bland, wait-for-cable "Ghost Town", I've come to realize that the rom-com has been replaced by the com-o-age film. The bottom line is that today's romantic comedies simply do not have any romance in them. Instead, these movies focus on one character's realization that they are immature and need to grow up. The women in these films (be it Wedding Crashers, Knocked Up, or Ghost Town) are little more than tangible rewards waiting for the guys at the end of their journeys.

Yesterday's Battle of the Sexes has been replaced with today's Refusal to Grow Up. I guess it shouldn't be a surprise that a generation that extols the virtues of "30 is the new 20" finds itself embracing films about retarded inner-growth but can't we at least have two people battling these issues? Can't we fill our comedies with relationships that have more hurdles than just the man's own immaturity? And I'm not glamorizing the past. It's not like Doris Day and Rock Hudson played three-dimensional characters in most of their films but at least both of their characters had personality, problems, and potential.

What might be the most troubling aspect of this latest movement is that there are a bevy of beauties out there who are being wasted. These talented actresses are given nothing to work with despite the fact that I'd argue that most of them have more to offer than the male counterparts. Gone is the whip-smart dialogue. For these ladies, hi-jinks rarely ensue. Instead, their job is to sit and giggle all googly-eyed while the leading man gets to play both the cad and the hooker-with-a-heart-of-gold.

Now don't get me wrong, some of these films are entertaining. I'm not saying that these films should be done away with. I just wish that a) we would call them what they are and b) actually get some legit rom-com's in the cineplexes.

Much like the modern spoof movies that don't actually spoof anything, there's little romance in the modern rom-com. And, to me, that's a damn shame.

September 18, 2008

So Far Not So Good.

0000027472_20060921214850.jpg

The start of the new TV season has been a major disappointment. Even with most of the shows flying in under the expectations radar, they've all quickly fallen off the DVR To Do list. 90210 lasted less than two episodes. Fringe and True Blood seem like Fox and HBO are turning back the clock to their early days of more pulpy/trashy than actual quality programming. Sons of Anarchy really had nothing to it. And JoAnna Garcia (star of Priviledge) seems a sure fire bet to replace Traylor Howard as the cute perky girl that always has a show on TV but never seems to become a name actress. The Wire is over, The Shield is ending, Entourage is Entourage and Gossip Girl is the Trot Nixon of TV (a steady, scrappy player who's fun to root for but will never reach the full potential you'd once hoped for).

So what's on the horizon? What can save the day?

30 Rock: I have to admit that I'm not a huge fan of Tina Fey but her show is one of the best on television.

Life: Fringe has been ripping off some of Life's throwaway gags (Damien Lewis, like the father in Fringe, were locked away for over a decade and now find the "new" technology like cellphones and seat warmers to be riveting), but Life is a much better show. The cases are more interesting and the arc of "Who Set Up Crews?" is much better. One possible downfall could be the treading water issue. Burn Notice is a good show with a similar "Who Set Me Up?" arc and they spent this season doing basically nothing because they didn't want to solve the bigger case and then not have anything for the next season. Hopefully the Life crew will have a better game plan. Also, I can spend this season trying to pin down whether Sarah Shahi is an underrated actress (possibly because she is so good looking) or if I'm overrating her (because she is definitely good looking as evidenced below).

Oh, and the ratings challenged Life might be in its last season, especially since it will get no help from lead-in Crusoe.

Dexter: One of the more underrated shows on TV gets one of the most underrated actors in TV (Jimmy Smits).

Heroes: Yeah I know. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. But what about the third time? Could it be a charm? I have to admit, I'm going to tune in for the third go-around even though the first two were fairly unsatisfying.

The Life & Times of Tim: I was laughing out loud at this clip. Something about the guy's voice and the cheap animation makes me crack up.

 

Worst Week: I know Worst Week is getting good reviews but all of the reviews have also said that they aren't sure how the show will be able to maintain for a full season (or even a handful of episodes). It might be worth checking out but I have a feeling it could be like Pushing Daisies. A show I adored (yeah I know how that sounds but watch the show and tell me that isn't the way to describe it) when it came out but quickly tired of after a few eps.

Eleventh Hour: Could be terrible and I'm not a follower of Bruckheimer TV but I'll give it a shot.

The Mentalist: I like Psych and it seems like the same show. The one issue which could make this more of a laugh at than laugh with is how flimsy the insights of The Mentalst are. He'll see one thing like lipstick on a collar and then guess something out of it. That's not really insight as much as it is a lucky albeit educated guess. And personally, The Luckybuteducatedguessist isn't much worse of a title than they have now.

 

sarah_shahi001.jpg

September 17, 2008

Politicked Off: Just Admit It

Would McCain stop acting like Americans are complete idiots, please? This whole "Fundamentals means the American people" is just ridiculous. Just look at the speech itself. He says people are scared but the fundamentals are strong. It's pretty clear that the people and the fundamentals are not the same thing unless the people are scared of themselves.

Also, I'm surprised more democrats haven't jumped on the fact that it isn't obvious that McCain thinks the American people are a strong lot. In fact, Phil Gramm, the architect of McCain's economic plan and man who has had his hand in the current mess, called the nation a bunch of whiners. By his account, the fundamentals were strong and it was the people who weren't keeping up.
And yes, I know McCain has distanced himself from Gramm but until I hear a pledge from McCain not to hire Gramm or his lackies, I'll assume that Phil is still on the short list for a key position in the McCain White House.

Not that Obama is innocent of this as well. Anyone with a brain realizes that he made the lipstick remark in response to Sarah Palin's lipstick joke. I don't think he was calling her a pig but he also wasn't just picking that phrase out of the nowhere. In fact, I think he basically admitted what he was really getting at on Letterman (at the 1:37 mark of this clip).

September 16, 2008

3 Points for Tracy McGrady

 

 

The LA Times had a nice article about T-Mac and his recent visit to the Sudan. What's even better is that McGrady's visit and the documentary that he made while down there show his personal ignorance about what's going on in the Sudan and how sometimes the best intentions aren't always in the best interest of the people. As the article explains:

"After encountering children playing soccer without a field, McGrady says he'll pay $1,000 for a new pitch only to be told that green grass isn't really the refugees' greatest need.

"A lot of the film has to deal with his being out of his element," says Rothstein. "And he realized that was maybe the most important part of the trip for him."

Currently, the celebrity/athlete political world usually revolves around soapboxes, sneakers sales, and sheer apathy. Very few celebs are willing to go out and just shed light on a situation. Instead they get up and act as if they are experts, preaching what people SHOULD think about an issue. Others follow the Michael Jordan m.o. of "Republicans buy sneakers too" and refuse to even touch politics in fear of hurting their market share. And a depressing number of others simply do not care.

While I haven't seen the film yet, the description of the film is what a documentary is supposed to be. Shockingly enough, you DOCUMENT something that happens. You don't go into it looking to prove a point. In today's political climate, the docs that usually get released are the Michael Moore variety which start with the exact story and conclusion that they want to tell but hopefully T-Mac's film will find distribution and perhaps inspire more people to investigate the world that lies outside of their comfort zone. 

Quote of the Moment

"I saw a lady on TV she was born without arms... and that was sad. But then they said 'Lola does not know the meaning of the word can't".

And that, to me, was actually worse in a way. Not only does she not have arms but she can't understand simple contractions."

 -- The Late Mitch Hedberg on his latest CD "Do You Believe in Gosh?" I highly recommend the CD. It's rough material but a lot of it is hilarious and some times the jokes that bomb are even funnier. After one bad joke he said, "That joke was dumb. Y'know, if I had a dollar for every time I said that... I'd be making money in a really weird way."

September 15, 2008

CBS Loves Psyche

If you've seen Psyche, then you'll probably wonder how CBS is getting away with "The Mentalilst", a show that rips off 90% of the Psyche premise. If you haven't seen Psyche then just watch this preview for "The Mentalist" because the CBS in-house (aka fake) reviewer basically describes the USA show. The only difference is that Psyche is funnier because the guy pretends to be psychic while in this show he admits to being nothing more than just very perceptive.


What's next for CBS? A show about a guy who is a neat freak, not quite obsessive compulsive, who solves crime ala Monk? A former CIA agent is fired under false pretenses (but not quite on the outs as Michael from Burn Notice) starts solving crimes to make money while he tries to find out who got him burned... I mean fired?

September 12, 2008

Politicked Off: So Frustrating

Once again, everyone is focusing on the silliness rather than the important issues. Charlie Gibson's interview last night was very disappointing to me because it featured Gotha! questions while never really pressing the nuances that actually make running the country such a difficult job.

While everyone is focusing on Palin's ignorance over what the Bush Doctrine is, they ignore the fact that she also basically tied American military forces to the whims of Georgia and Israel. When asked about Iran's nuclear potential and whether Israel should be allowed to attack the nuke sites if they felt threatened, Palin said (three times), "We cannot second guess the steps that Israel takes to defend itself." Now, instead of going deeper into this issue, asking where the line is drawn (if it is drawn) in terms of what Israel can get away with in the name of defending themselves, Gibson simply kept asking the same nuclear question over and over. Gibson basically turned the quagmire that is the Middle East into "If Nukes bad, is Israel attack good?"

Charlie pulled the same stunt when discussing Georgia. Rather than go into the intricacies of the situation, he just kept asking if Georgia should be let into NATO and if we should defend them. It's disappointing to see the U.S. and our media focusing on this fight between Russia and Georgia and ignoring the fact that the region it's over doesn't seem to want to be a part of either Georgia or Russia. We'll protect Georgia in the name of democracy but we'll ignore Ossetia and Abkhazia because, well, we'd like to keep Georgia as an ally. This is the same logic that kept the United States from recognizing the Armenian Genocide (and the half-assed thinking that has us arming the Kurds while also looking the other way while our ally Turkey attacks them).

Now I'll admit that I myself don't know all of the details of this story but to simply ask the possible next Vice President of the USA a watered down "So do you think Georgia should be in NATO?" question is embarrassing. If everything was that simple then Sarah Palin could easily be Vice President. Hell, Sarah Jessica Parker could be the VP. But there's more to it than that and we never got the chance to find out if Palin has the chops. While some critics will fault Sarah Palin for sticking with her talking points/pre-scripted answers, the fact is that Charlie Gibson allowed her to by not touchiing on any detail or any nuance.

Even on the issue of gay marriage, Gibson dropped the ball. How? Because he didn't even ask about it. He asked if Palin thought homosexuality was learned or a choice or genetic. First off, that seems like an odd question to someone who subscribes to creationism. Besides that, who cares? It doesn't matter WHY she thinks people are gay, it matters HOW she is going to treat them. Again, Gibson asks a question that has a simple politically correct answer and then skirts the real issues. (And Whoopi Goldberg didn't help matters on The View. When McCain brought up wanting states to decide rather than the court, she brought up the fact that slavery was in the Constitution, rather than the fact that if it wasn't for the Courts, we'd probably still have segregated schools and separate but equal.)

So here we are. Exactly where we were before. The left is ridiculing Sarah Palin while the right is claiming that people are being unfair and picking on her. And honestly, I think both sides are correct.

September 11, 2008

Politicked Off: Matt Misplays His Hand

I can't help but thinking that Sarah Palin is on her way to becoming the next Dan Quayle. Her recent speeches have either half truths (she was for the Bridge to Nowhere before being against it), complete mistakes (saying that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had to be stopped because they were costing tax payers too much money, which makes no sense because they were never federally funded), or boast a down home way of life in spite of the fact that it cost her constituents millions. Really, who puts a plane on E-Bay? What's next? Defense contracts on cragislist? Even better, her way of side-stepping the "Will you be the VP candidate?" question was to plead ignorance.

The most upsetting thing though is that most liberals seem to be celebrating comments like Matt Damon's "It's like a bad Disney film" which, although true, come off as elitist and definitely off-putting for most of the country. As usual, it seems like the old saying is holding; Republicans and Democrats are fighting for voters whom the Republicans don't really care about and whom the Democrats don't really like.

TOLDJA! I mean... uh...

Hollywood news hound Nikki Finke has been championing Diane English's version of The Women for most of this year, using it as an example of how female-centric films get the shaft by Hollywood studios. In June she argued:

I'm told Warner Bros execs including movie boss and charter member of the he-man women-haters club Jeff Robinov (who keeps maintaining he was just joking when he said he didn't want to make any more motion pictures with women as the leads) recently screened The Women and didn't like it. "It's not Sex In The City. It's just not that kind of movie," a studio insider insisted to me. Puh-leeze, who indeed wants a low-budget $16.5 million chick flick written, directed and produced by one of the biz's greatest women's comedy writers of seminal Murphy Brown fame... That stars quality "name" actress like Meg Ryan, Annette Bening, Eva Mendes, Debra Messing, Bette Midler, Jada Pinkett-Smith, Debi Mazur, Joanna Gleason, Carrie Fisher, Lynn Whitfield and Cloris Leachman... That reworks the original so it takes place in the broadcasting world and an ashram-like retreat where Meg plays a fashion designer and wife and mother, Eva the skanky mistress, and Annette the deliciously two-faced BFF and so on...

As it turns out, The Women seems to be the Sarah Palin to Hillary Clinton's Sex and The City. The film currently sits at an amazing 00% at Rotten Tomatoes. Now, I'm not fan of film critics and think they've often led us astray (especially this summer) but when you reach the dregs that only a few films like Disaster Movie have been able to reach, odds are that your film just isn't very good. 

Not that Ms. Finke doesn't have a point. Female-centric films are in such a decline that even most films that pass as romantic comedies today are really male coming-of-age films in which the woman is just someone waiting around for the guy to start acting his age. Unfortunately, championing stuff like The Women is nothing more than a surefire way to help the opposing argument. 

But who knows, maybe the film will overcome its rating and actually make some money. Maybe women will come out and see the film, if only to spite other new releases like Burn After Reading and Righteous Kill. I wouldn't bet on it and right now, I'm guessing Warner Brothers wishes they went with their original plan and just dumped The Women.

September 09, 2008

On the Fringe About "Fringe"

It seems most critics over at Metacritic disagree with me and find Fringe to have some redeeming qualities. What I saw was a slow, boring, absolutely ridiculous show that played more like Garth Marenghi's Dark Places than X-Files or even JJ Abrams's Lost. In fact, most of the reviewers acknowledge this but willfully ignore it such as Mary McNamara who wrote in the LA TImes:

"if you're the type of person who needs every little thing, or indeed any little thing, to make sense in a pilot, then you should probably watch Fringe in solitude, preferably with the door closed, so the rest of us can enjoy it for what it is--an uneven but promising jumble of horror"

What strikes me as odd is that people heap praise upon Abrams but when they discuss this show, it's almost like they are discussing trash TV like Silk Stalkings or 90210 (the new version of which I gave up on halfway through the second episode). 

Of course, there are the people who loved it like the New York Times' Allesandra Stanley who wrote:

And as pilots go, this one is sensational, an artful, suspenseful mix of horror, science fiction, layered conspiracies and extended car chases. “Fringe” sets out to stretch the boundaries of conventional network series.

I honestly have no idea what show she watched. Even the strongest supporters admit that the show wasn't fresh, original, or even surprising. Was there really one twist that she didn't see coming? The show makes absolutely no sense and requires such a suspension of disbelief that it takes away from the whole concept of the show. It's hard to make a show that asks "What if fringe science was real?" when everything is already completely unrealistic. Honestly, the fringe science was the most plausible thing about this show and, to me, that takes away from the allure of it all.

September 05, 2008

The 20 or So Most Influential Films of Cinema's Second Century

Nobody can really be sure who invented the first film projector. There are many claims and different fathers of cinema but I'm going to side with the Frenchman Louis Lumiere. Not only did Lumiere have one of the first widely recognized projectors but he also showed the incredible foresight that defines most Hollywood executives when he famously spoke, "The cinema is an invention without a future."

Lumiere's claimed date of invention was 1895 so let's say that the second century of cinema actually started 13 years ago. So which films since 1995 have proven to be the most influential? To start, there's a difference between influential and inspirational. Many people have been inspired by Little Miss Sunshine, Best in Show, or L.A. Confidential, but those films didn't really have a lasting impact on the fact on the face of the Hollywood. A lot of people cite "Lost Highway" as a classic but nobody has been able to (and few have even tried) to follow in Lynch's footsteps.
Similarly, a film has to have a lasting impact. Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings started an onrush of kiddie lit movies but almost all of them have been disappointing. My Big Fat Greek Wedding got studios thinking that there was money in independent film but now everyone's closing their indie arms (mainly because the faux-indies still held to the Major Studio way of thinking and would have had nothing to do with a film like Greek Wedding). Some might sing the praises of Sex and the City saving female-centric films, but we heard the same song and dance after The First Wives Club. In the end, you can't tell the true influence right away so for this list, I'm only looking at the first decade of this second century, 1995 - 2005.

1. Toy Story (1995)
The reign of Pixar and computer animation begins!
2. Independence Day/Twister (1996)
Bombast over believability, these films ushered in the new era of blockbusters in which special effects trumped substance and script. If it wasn't for these films, movies like Transformers might have to actually spend time on plots, characters, and a love story with more emotion than "I'm really glad I got in that car with you."
3. X-Men (2000)
Comic book movies weren't seen as legit box office threats in 2000. The marquee heroes (Batman and Superman) had fallen off, other attempts were either modest successes (Spawn, Blade, The Crow) or disasters (Barb Wire, Tank Girl). In Hollywood, X-Men wasn't seens as a property that had wide appeal or recognition. On top of that, the film was drowning in bad buzz. There had been multiple re-writes, it was over budget and the key role of Wolverine was re-cast almost a month into filming by some unknown foreigner named Hugh Jackman.
After X-Men became a surprise hit, any and every superhero film got greenlit and the Era of Comic-Book Movie began.
4. The Real Cancun (2003)
People think of it as a pipe dream now but back in '03, the reality movie was very close to becoming an actual genre. The Real Cancun was getting a major release and another spring break film from the producer of The Bachelor was in the can and about to get a legit advertising push. Reality was graduating to the big screen. Of course, the Real Cancun was a complete bomb which led to the other spring break film getting shelved, and the megaplexes were saved from the Reality Invasion. But just think, if more people had gone to see The Real Cancum, The Simple Life could have been a film and we’d probably be seeing a Hills movie this summer.
6a. Tommy Boy (1995)/Billy Madison (1995)
Old School (2003) helped launch a new batch of Coming of Age comedies but these were the originals that helped pave the way. Like Apatow's films, these movies were not about the troubles of being in a relationship as much they are about men having to grow up to even be able to function in the real world.
6b. There's Something About Mary (1997)
Hollywood learned that a) gross and stupid sell and b) Dumb and Dumber wasn't a fluke. The R-rated comedy regained it's footing in Hollywood with Mary as the Farrelly Brothers showed that gross-out comedies could out-gross even the highest expectations. They laid the ground work with Dumb and Dumber but Mary was a hit both in the box office and with critics. Two years later, the floodgates would open after American Pie brought the gross out gags to the teen comedy.
7a. The Ice Storm (1997)
The Problems of the Upper Middle Class becomes High Art. In the ultimate post-modern shift, the people who drown themselves in hipster chic to escape the problems in their lives suddenly make their problems into hipster chic. I think Ang Lee's outsider sensibilities made this film better than the new wave of more self-indulgent films (The Savages, Margot at the Wedding) but I believe that this film helped set off the trend.
Personally, I wish that more filmmakers addressed the personal demons/community lashing out at whoever they can sentiment of 1997's "The Sweet Hereafter" as it resonates more with the current political climate. Instead, American Beauty took The Ice Storm mindset to the Oscars and it's been boo-hoo bourgeois ever since.
7b. Happiness (1998)
Mainstream appeal becomes the enemy. Happiness made no attempt to be liked and, in fact, was almost revelling in the fact that it wasn't for most people. This film was instrumental in the break of indie films from the mainstream. Before, people would whine "Oh I wish people could discover the truly great films like Drugstore Cowboy or Welcome to the Dollhouse." After "Happiness", it was no longer a problem if the mainstream didn't like the movie; instead it was like a badge of honor. The film mixed John Waters's audacity with the standard Young American Angst, making it more palatable to the every-hipster.
8. Scream (1996)
The horror movie would be brought back to life, opening the door for countless teen slasher films, classic horror remakes, and the torture porn movement. Films like Saw, House of 1000 Corpses and 28 Days Later may have directed the horror movement in new directions but none of it would have happened if not for Scream.
9. The Matrix (1999)
After this film, suddenly every action star knew some sort of martial-arts. Stylistically, it turned a new (and now much copied) page in the history of action and sci-fi films.
10. The Sixth Sense (1999)
Obviously, this film made the twist ending and creepy little kids en vogue but possibly the more important influence this film had was that it helped bring spooky back into a genre that had been over-run by slashers. People remembered that there was more to ghost stories and scary movies than just the shock of someone sneaking up behind a busty co-ed with an axe. You could have a spooky film without being a "horror" film.
11. Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels (1999)
While Tarantino focused on paying homage to his favorite genres, Guy Ritchie helped invent a new one. As Ebert wrote, "'Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels' is like Tarantino crossed with the Marx Brothers, if Groucho had been into chopping off fingers". While Tarantino's style (namely his wordy scripts and hip dialogue) had its moment in the sun, Ritchie's brand has become a staple of the megaplex. Just as the Marx Brothers influenced Looney Toons, Ritchie's film helped lead to the cartoonish actioners like The Transporter, Death Race, Layer Cake, Crank, Wanted, etc.
12. Friday (1995)/The Nutty Professor (1996)
After years of disappointing to middling box office returns from African-American-led urban dramas and rom-com’s, the new (and only) black film movement would be broad comedies.
13. Saving Private Ryan (1998)
Redefined the war film by making neo-realistic action the Gold Standard. More cynically, it masterfully mixed violence with a War is Hell message that made everything seem like it fit for a legit purpose and wasn't at all gratuitous.
14. Braveheart (1995)
The period epic becomes a viable genre again, opening the door for Gladiator, 300, and others.
15.Don't Be A Menace... (1996)
The precursor to the Scary Movie franchise, this film also was the unfortunate inspiration for Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer who've littered the theaters with one horrific film after another. This film also started the upsetting trend of making spoof movies that are loosely tied together bits that spoofed many different films/people.
16. Analyze This (1999)
Slumming ain't so bad. If the great Robert DeNiro can do a comedy, why can't Joan Allen pop up in Death Race? While the indie film was becoming more and more resistant to even being acknowledged by the mainstream, many of its former darlings started willfully signing on for silly films. "Analyze This" showed that the crossing over could be successful both in terms of quality and box office. The quality of these crossovers has pretty much declined ever since but that's not stopping anyone from cashing those paychecks.
17. Everest (1998)
The film that put Imax on the map.
18. Remember the Titans (2000)
If you’re watching a sports movie, odds are that it’s going to be some uplifting story of hope and faith. You can pretty much thank this film for bringing back the "Brian's Song" sentimentality to the mainstream sports film.
19. Chicago (2002)/Save the Last Dance (2001)
These are the films that saved song and dance. Chicago is obvious because of its 171 million dollars domestic take and Oscar win but Save the Last Dance was the film that paved the way for the recent spate of dance-centric films. Moulin Rouge! (2001) also deserves credit for helping to bring back the musical.
20. Traffic (2000)
While it's hardly the first film with interwoven storylines, the approach was perfected in Traffic. Nowadays, it seems like you can't make a political film without mixing it up (Babel, Fast Food Nation, Syriana, Lions for Lambs, the upcoming Crossing Over).

Honorable Mention: The Usual Suspects, Bottle Rocket/Kicking and Screaming/Flirting with Disaster, Dark City/City of Lost Children, Babe.

September 04, 2008

Casting the New Ghostbusters

Word has arrived that two writers from The Office are going to try their hand at crafting a sequel to "Ghostbusters". Original reports also mentioned that the movie could be about "a new group of ghoul chasers". So the next question is, who should play the new Ghostbusters?

Personally, I'm a fan of going in unexpected directions with casting. I'm really hoping that the next Batman features Tilda Swinton as The Riddler. For this reason, I'm not a fan of any of the "obvious" Hollywood choices like Owen Wilson, Ryan Reynolds, Jack Black, or Seth Rogen. Honestly, I might even consider casting three women.

So here are my choices (and character suggestions):

- The spiritual ghost buster who doesn't believe all ghosts are bad is Penelope Cruz. I know some people are annoyed by her but I thought she was very good in a rather dull film "Bandidas". She seems like a natural comic actress and she wouldn't look bad in a uniform or covered in slime. The Plan B would be James Franco, in a sort of soberly spiritual version of his Pineapple Express role.

- The gung-ho 'buster who thinks before he speaks, fights, or does anything at all would be played by Danny McBride. The one thing I'd like to change about McBride would be that he actually does know what he's doing but has a hair trigger. So far, he usually just plays dolts. I'd like this role to be someone who is intelligent but just gets caught up in the moment too often. With Plan B, I might actually go with Rachel McAdams or Craig Robinson.

- The "Egon", wise-cracking brainiac would be noneother than Amy Adams. I'm a huge fan of Adams but would like to see her in more films where she's herself or a regular woman. She played the nerd well in Talladega Nights but this role would give her more sass. I could also see Kristin Wiig in this role.

- The leading man. The spokeperson for the crew who sells the Ghostbusters to the public but is actually a bit of a coward would be played by James Marsden. The more obvious choice would be Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson but I'd like to give Marsden a shot. I think he is Franco-esque in the fact that his comic potential has yet to be utilized.

Now, I don't know if those are the character types that they will be going with but I wouldn't mind seeing a Cruz, McBride, Adams, Marsden lineup.

 

September 03, 2008

Politicked Off: Obama on O'Reilly, Thursday at 8 est

Just when I was excited for the kickoff of the NFL season, something came along that blew it out of water. Barrack Obama is going to visit the No Spin Zone and get interviewed by Bill O'Reilly tomorrow night at 8 pm Eastern standard time.

Honestly, I'm not sure this is good idea for Obama. O'Reilly doesn't really interview. He tries to bully and he usually resorts to a victory-via-volume tactic of shouting down those who disagree with him. He cuts people off and, even worse, doesn't matter if facts get in the way of his argument. (The much discussed Malmedy mistakes being the prime examples). Bill O'Reilly is a prima donna who is going to be firing on all cylanders tomorrow and the idea that this could even be a discussion is ridiculous since he'll never budge from his points-of-view. Even when his buddy Dennis Miller has corrected him on things, O'Reilly will begrudgingly admit that there could be something redeeming about the other side of the argument but still throws in little jabs and mocking statements to try to support his original position.

Of course, it's not like Bill O'Reilly is alone. Most news shows are just op-ed programs and blogs don't even seem to want to pretend to be unbiased. Pundits want to be celebrities. They don't want people to listen to the news as much as they want people just to listen to them speak. I guarantee every big name news personality is jealous of O'Reilly, not because of the great interview but because he's going to be as close as any of them can be to a rock star tomorrow night. There was nothing more disappointing to me than to watch Arianna Huffington's answer to the Drudge Report turn out to be nothing more than a lefty version of Drudge's site. Rather than trying to show people that she can be better, Huffington just showed she could be as bad as her opposition.

Politically, I get the move; this high profile matchup is going to make McCain's speech an afterthought (especially with many Americans skipping politics altogether to watch football) but this is a ploy that definitely could blow up in the Dems' faces. It probably won' be high minded politics but it'll almost certainly be good theater.

September 02, 2008

The New Guilty Pleasure?

"90210" premiered and I have to say it didn't disappoint. Then again, I wasn't expecting much so that doesn't really say anything. The show was a bit clunky and had too many stories going on but it was what it needed to be, which was a nice escape and solid soap.

The worst part of the show is, not surprisingly, the tagged on adult stuff which was probably added to keep older viewers interested. The producers need to figure out if they want to keep the adults as key characters or not because the way they are handling it now is pretty poor. I mean, how do you not show the moment that a husband tells his wife that he has a child from another woman? That whole storyline, as well as the druggie actress, could have been delayed so that they could focus on the main characters in the first couple hours. As it was, nothing was really built out. For instance, Ethan (who seems like the #1 candidate for Steve Sanders receding hairline award) takes one scene to decide to kick Dixon off the team and then one quick, almost inexplicable scene later, to change his mind. Nevermind 90210, it was flimsy by "Saved By The Bell" standards.

If there's a breakout star in this bunch, my guess is it's either Shenae Grimes, Jessica Stroup, or Tristan Wilds (although I'm basing that more on his turn in "The Wire" than this). That's being generous though because there isn't really one character that really distinguished themselves from the typical teen fare. In terms of pilot episodes, "Gossip Girl" was far more effective in giving us characters and conflicts in one episode than "90210" did in two. Hopefully, "90210" will build to a stronger show as opposed to flaming out like "Gossip Girl". There's room to grow but it definitely needs to focus a bit and infuse some life/personality into the characters.

 

One of these things is just like the other...

Diablo Cody is ready to follow up "Juno" with a horror movie. Something about Megan Fox killing guys or something. Anyway, it sounds interesting and I think the horror film could play to Diablo's strengths so I'll probably be there opening weekend. (I'll also admit to being a fan of the Hole song of the same name). There's just one problem. Someone over at promotions at Fox Atomic better come up with a new poster and quick. The original one sheet for the film is basically a mirror image (minus one enlarged canine) of True Blood's poster.

 

 

Getting a "Life"

"The Shield" is back again tonight for its final season. On top of that, one of the best new shows of last season is now on Hulu. I highly recommend checking out "Life". While the lead actor, Damian Lewis is a little much in the pilot episode, he tones it down as the show goes on. Oh, and in case you can't place one of the cops in the beginning of the show, he played Howard, one of Theo's friends from The Cosby Show.

September 01, 2008

XSOXOver

gossip-girl.jpgGossip Girl returned to the little screen and I'm sorry to say that I'm now innocent when it comes to this guilty pleasure. The premiere did nothing to allay fears that the show had jumped the shark and for a show just in its second season, the first episode of year two was shockingly been there, done that. In fact, the low-rated, highly-hyped show stuck to their tried and true formula of basing the show around some big party (which usually takes place in Act 4). Instead of Kiss On the Lips from last year, it's the White Party this year.
And by white party, they mean white. I'm no Hamptonite but I'd think that Puffy's famous White Party would have its fair share of African-Americans. It is pretty incredible how lily white the cast and extras are for a show that takes place in New York.
The premiere episode just didn't have much of anything. They threw in some gratuitous making out to get their naughty rating up but the show itself seemed like it was just going through the motions. Josh Schwartz continued his O.C.ing of the show, adding more late season 90210 twists to the proceedings, this time by adding a boy toy who isn't what he seems, he's more. The entire Blair/Lord Whoever storyline is likely to battle the arrival of Georgina in Jump The Shark discussions. For a show that looked like it could promise a glimpse into the mildly realistic lives of New York's elite, it's now 100% silly soap.
As with The O.C., it's a damn shame. They had something and couldn't maintain it past a half season. Oh well, it was fun while it lasted.

SoulMix: 0908

This month's mix has a couple new bands (or, at least, new to me) and some old standards.

Hosting by Yahoo!